My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
89-44 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SPRINGHILL ADDITION
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1989
>
89-44 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SPRINGHILL ADDITION
>
89-44 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SPRINGHILL ADDITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:50 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 4:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
89-44
Res Ord Title
AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SPRINGHILL ADDITION
Approved Date
5/15/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. 4 <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission - April 6 , 1989 - Page Nine <br /> would connect to the e�isting sanitary system which would provide <br /> adequate service and had been approved bq the Engineering Depart- <br /> ment. <br /> Regarding the eanironment, Mr. Cochran agreed that the area is <br /> , attractive but stated that if the Citq is to graw this area would <br /> lend itself well for nice single family dwellings . He noted that <br /> some trees would be taken down but not all. Mr. Cochran stated <br /> that both he and Mr. Horve would be available to the objectors <br /> regarding their concerns and requested the Commission to proceed <br /> on this petition as time was of the essence in order to be <br /> finished bq winter. <br /> Mr. Goatley questioned the easement for drainage swales . Mr. <br /> Cochran stated that drainage areas would be placed in the low <br /> grade areas so that when the houses are built drainage will be <br /> provided for. He noted this would not complicate the situation <br /> on Robinson Avenue. <br /> Ms . Eggers stated that drainage would flow iato the forest area ' <br /> adjacent to her property and that area already floods exces- <br /> sively. She stated her concern that the 13 houses would coner <br /> more area than two condominium units and that with more people in <br /> the houses there would be more sewage. <br /> Ms. Stoll expressed her resentmeat of the need for City growth in <br /> order to build on virgin land as there were other areas for sale. <br /> Ms . Martin presented the report of the Plat Committee stating <br /> that the committee had reviewed the petition and recommended ap- <br /> proval of the petition as presented. <br /> Mr. McQueen presented the recommendation of staff : <br /> The subject petition requests amendmeat to an R-2 Residence <br /> Development Plan for the Springhill Addition, which is generallp <br /> located north of Country Club Road along Greenway Lane . This <br /> plan was first approved in April , 1967 , and subsequently amended <br /> on four occasions . Covering a total of approximately eighteen <br /> acres , it presently calls for development of both single familp <br /> and multifamily dwellings . The single family area generally lies <br /> west of Greenwaq Lane adjacent to Lake Decatur while the area � <br /> designated for multifamily is located east of Greenwaq Lane. � <br /> The proposed amendment calls for develo ment of said a <br /> P rea desig- <br /> nated as multifamily into thirteen single family lots instead . <br /> Vehicular access to tea of these lots would be provided via a new <br /> public street constructed north of Countrq Club Road; the remain- <br /> ing three lots would have access from a private drive estended <br /> from the cul-de-sac of said new street. There would be no new <br /> street connection to existing Greenway Lane. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.