Laserfiche WebLink
recently, it was thought that the Andruss decision would have no <br /> bearing on the validity of such provisions . <br /> Transmitted herewith is a statement of a pending case, which <br /> if resolved in the direction it has taken so far, could well <br /> cloud the efficacy of Chapter 66 . 1 . Therein the Court seizes <br /> upon the continued existence of , although unenforced, invalid <br /> provisions of ordinar.ce to conclude that other�ise valid provisions <br /> cannot be enforced because the sar.ie are a sham or device to <br /> escape the effect of preemption. <br /> In order to avoid such a question here, it is recommended , <br /> that Chapter 59 . 1 be repealed . , <br />