My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5887 VACATING EASEMENT - COUNTRY MANOR
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1973
>
5887 VACATING EASEMENT - COUNTRY MANOR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 1:02:26 PM
Creation date
10/17/2016 1:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
5887
Res Ord Title
VACATING EASEMENT - COUNTRY MANOR
Approved Date
10/15/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> . . . � " gocK���� :a�F Z�8 � <br /> , � � � <br /> , <br /> � � Y & � � � � <br /> � <br /> REAL ESTATE sn�Es — MORTGAGE LOANS — INSURANCE — BUILDERS 252 E. MAIN, DECATUR, ILLINOIS 62523 � <br /> -- -- , �4 phone (21n 4Z8-3451 � <br /> �, ==— ---- -- --_-__ -- .�- a� z z ` <br /> � �:c .R���=--. -`�- _ '— - r s� � <br /> e s,,�.=�•� '� r -.�' �'•.�� �,y_�- $ "�'�' <br /> . �- �-�'°��=�_�- � ��=�j � <br /> � ,,•, + dg <br /> ESf��F" <br /> October 8, 1973 <br /> i <br /> , Mr. James Uhl <br /> Downing, Smith, Jorgensen, & Uhl <br /> 295 North Franklin Street � <br /> Decatur, Illinois <br /> Re: Country Manor Subdivisiorf <br /> Easement - Lot Sixty-four (64) <br /> Decatur, Illinois <br /> Dear Mr. Uhl: � <br /> Pursuant to your request Verne E. Roby and I have inspected the above <br /> captioned easement. The purpose of the inspection was to estimate <br /> fair compensation that would accrue to the recipients from the� benefit <br /> derived from this vacation. ! <br /> r <br /> The area in question is 5 ft. in width parallel to the Easterly side � <br /> lot line of Lot Sixty-four (64) beino approximately 134 ft. long or F- <br /> approx. 670 sq. ft. � <br /> The apparent zoning for the area is R-2 One Family Residential. The � <br /> area in question would be a side yard and this requirement is a mini- <br /> mum width of 8 ft. with an aggregate of 16 ft. Therefore, it appears � �I <br /> the land could only be used as a side yard. ' <br /> We were advised the easement was of no use at present to the, utility <br /> company or other interests. <br /> The advised reason for the vacation is to build a larger home on a ~ � <br /> larger lot. It is our opinion the use of two lots together would <br /> not increase the value of a large lot over two smaller lots and, in � <br /> general practice, it tends to decrease the front foot value to some <br /> extent. It appears this is a convenience to a developer or builder I <br /> rather than a value increase. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> . � <br /> I <br /> ( <br /> MEMBER k <br /> MORTGAGE BANKERS OF AMERICA- DECATUR BOARD OF REALTORS- DECATUR ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE AGENTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.