Laserfiche WebLink
Matching Funds — Absent specific federal statutory authority to do so, JAG award funds <br /> may not be used as a match for other federal awards. <br /> Prohibited and Controlled Equipment and Associated Procedures under JAG — The <br /> JAG statute, at 34 U.S.C. § 10152(d), specifically identifies a list of prohibited items. In <br /> addition, consistent with Executive Order 14074, Advancing Effective, Accountable <br /> Policing and Criminal Justice Practices To Enhance Public Trust and Public Safety of <br /> May 25, 2022, the use of OJP grant funds for the purchase or transfer of certain <br /> equipment has been designated as prohibited or controlled starting with FY 2023 OJP <br /> grant funds. Details and associated procedures for requesting prior approval, where <br /> applicable, can be found in the JAG Prohibited and Controlled Equipment Guidance and <br /> the JAG FAQs. <br /> Note: The use of BJA grant funds for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), including <br /> unmanned aircraft vehicles (UAV) and/or any accompanying accessories to support UAS <br /> or UAV devices/systems, is unallowable. <br /> Other Program Requirements <br /> A unit of local government that applies for and receives an FY 2023 JAG award must <br /> note the following: <br /> Trust Fund — Units of local government may draw down JAG funds either in advance or <br /> on a reimbursement basis. To draw down in advance, a trust fund must be established in <br /> which to deposit the funds. The trust fund must be in an interest-bearing account, unless <br /> one of the exceptions in 2 C.F.R. § 200.305(b)(8) apply. If subrecipients draw down JAG <br /> funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in which to deposit the funds. For <br /> additional information, see 2 C.F.R. § 200.305. <br /> Minimum Requirements for Extreme Risk Protection Order Programs (ERPOs) — <br /> ERPOs must include, at a minimum- <br /> 1. Pre-deprivation and post-deprivation due process rights that prevent any violation <br /> or infringement of the Constitution of the United States, including, but not limited to, <br /> the Bill of Rights and the substantive or procedural due process rights guaranteed <br /> under the fifth and 14th amendments to the Constitution of the United States, as <br /> applied to the states and as interpreted by state courts and United States courts <br /> (including the Supreme Court of the United States). Such programs must include, <br /> at the appropriate phase to prevent any violation of constitutional rights, at <br /> minimum, notice, the right to an in-person hearing, an unbiased adjudicator, the <br /> right to know opposing evidence, the right to present evidence, and the right to <br /> confront adverse witnesses. <br /> 2. The right to be represented by counsel at no expense to the government. <br /> 3. Pre-deprivation and post-deprivation heightened evidentiary standards and proof <br /> which mean not less than the protections afforded to a similarly situated litigant in <br /> Page 14 of 38 <br /> O-BJA-2023-171790 <br />