Laserfiche WebLink
CU <br /> ti <br /> �D <br /> E. Growth and Development Outside the Area <br /> at <br /> An examination of several blocks surrounding the Area shows that development or <br /> reinvestment has not been occurring. The residential areas reflect a clea� level of lack of <br /> maintenance or significant investment. The houses are at the lower en of the housing <br /> M market in terms of value and do not comport to the current housing tandards of the <br /> community. No new commercial development appears to have been made in the last ten <br /> to fifteen years. <br /> Y <br /> a <br /> �o In a 4 block radius outside the proposed Redevelopment Project Area, uring the last 5 <br /> years, there was no indication that significant investment was occurring. uilding permits <br /> for new construction averaged less than $81,000 per year. It is clea that no strong <br /> investment trends were occurringthat would show the possibility o private sector <br /> investment within the proposed Redevelopment Project Area. In fact, i is unlikely that <br /> any kind of investment would occur without a stabilizing project similar�o the one that is <br /> being proposed for the Area. <br /> F. Growth and Development Inside the Area <br /> Within at least the last ten years, there has been no growth within the proposed <br /> Redevelopment Project Area. In fact, the opposite appears to be occ ming since the <br /> vacant parcels in the area were created by the demolition of existing structures without <br /> any replacement with new structures. This is supported by an examination of building <br /> pen-nits which have been issued in the area over the past few years. Du ing the last five <br /> years only $1,300 in actual building permits were actually issued within the proposed <br /> Redevelopment Project Area for building improvements or approximately $4.260 a year. <br /> Within the same time period in the proposed Redevelopment Project Area. there were <br /> $150;800 in demolition permits issued with no subsequent new constniction following <br /> the demolition of structures. This clearly demonstrated the lack of reinvestment in the <br /> area. <br /> These indicate that any investment has been for routine maintenanc of the existing <br /> buildings which has been minimal considering the condition of the buildings and the site <br /> improvements. <br /> G. Analysis of New Development in the City of Decatur and Surrounding Areas <br /> New development within the metro area has been occurring at the north end of Decatur <br /> and in Forsyth in proximity to the intersection of I-72 and U.S. Route i. In addition, <br /> new development has occurred in the southeast part of Decatur and in Mount Zion. New <br /> development is also occumng in the City's Central Business District and plans are <br /> underway for significant development of the City's lakefront. None of these areas are in <br /> close proximity to the Area. Thus, no new development trends are, moving in the <br /> direction of the Area. <br /> i <br /> 23 <br />