Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> M <br /> ti <br /> H. Receptivity of the Marketplace to Development in the Area <br /> m Discussions took place with individuals who were knowledgeable about1the potential for <br /> development in the Area. These included developers, engineers, City''officials and an <br /> CL employee of a local financial institution. The clear indication was that t is Area has not <br /> Nand would not develop without public assistance from the City. Reflected in these <br /> conversations were the lower economic demographics within the neighborhoods around <br /> the Area, the lack of rental levels necessary to entice development too cur, the existing <br /> •• lack of maintenance and investment, and the economics required for any new project to <br /> s be developed. Finally, after reviewing the proforma for the proposed project for the <br /> 0 <br /> 00 Area, it is clear that this type of development would not occur given the rental levels <br /> existing in the Area and the cost of acquisition of property and demolition of existing <br /> structures within the Area. <br /> The evidence of lack of investment in the area, both by existin., property owrin rs and potential <br /> private sector entities, clearly demonstrate that the Area has not been subject t investment and <br /> would not be subject to investment without the assistance provided by the Cit pursuant to its <br /> Home Rule powers and the Act. <br /> Absent participation and assistance by the City, private investment will not t ke place in the <br /> Redevelopment Area as a whole. The incidence of blighting factors is likely to ncrease, and the <br /> health. safety, and welfare of the public will be impaired. The long term best nterests of local <br /> taxing bodies will be best served by the adoption of this Plan. <br /> SECTION VII <br /> FINDINGS OF NEED FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br /> It was determined that the Area, as a whole, is both a blighted and conservation area. The Act <br /> requires that no redevelopment plan be adopted without meeting additional requ'rements. These <br /> are addressed below: <br /> A. Area on the Whole, not Subject to Growth <br /> As set forth in Section VI above, the Area on the whole has not been subjec�t to growth and <br /> investment. <br /> B. Conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br /> The proposed General Land Use Plan (Exhibit F) of this Tax Increment Redevelopment <br /> conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. All development in the Redevelopment roject Area will <br /> also conform to applicable City codes and ordinances as may be in effect at that ime. <br /> C. Estimated Dates for Completion of the Redevelopment Project <br /> Obligations incurred to finance the improvements will be repaid by incrementalrevenues which <br /> may be supplemented with funds from other sources (local sales tax, state orfederal loans or <br /> ?a <br /> I <br />