Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> COMMON NAME: Fifty-One and Seventy-Two Fourth Addition-located in the 5100 Block of <br /> Hickory Point Frontage Road <br /> GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> Hearing Date March 7, 2013 <br /> Calendar No. 13-10 <br /> Property Location 5100 Block of Hickory Point Frontage Road <br /> Requested Action No Direct Access to Public Street and No Frontage on Public <br /> Street <br /> Petitioner Executive Development Company <br /> Representative Phillip W. Cochran, PWC <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> 1. The subject site is currently developed with a hotel. <br /> I <br /> 2. The Final Minor Plat of Fifty-One and Seventy-Two Fourth Addition h s been reviewed by <br /> Engineering, Fire and Planning. The petitioner is requesting the approval of no direct access <br /> to a public street and no frontage on a public street. The owner prop ses to subdivide the <br /> property into two (2) lots in which the proposed Lot Two (2) will have no frontage on and no <br /> direct access to a public street. According to the Zoning Ordinance each lot shall have <br /> frontage on, direct access to, a public street or way that is improved to City standards, unless <br /> the Council shall otherwise direct, by approval of a subdivision plat sol showing submitted, <br /> heard and considered in the manner provided in the subdivision Regulations for the City. <br /> 3. The purpose of the subdivision is to create two (2) lots for futureevelopment of the <br /> proposed Lot(2) and allow for the sale of the hotel on the proposed Lot One (1). <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> 1. The petitioner proposes to subdivide the property into two (2) lots. The proposed Lot Two <br /> (2)will have no frontage on and no direct access to a public street. <br /> 2. The current public right-of-way terminates near the southernmost entr ce of the Cracker <br /> Barrel Restaurant. The existing 24 foot wide concrete private access road is acceptable to the <br /> City to serve the existing hotel as well as future development on proposed Lot Two (2). The <br /> City would not require a new road to be constructed that meets current ci y standards. <br />