My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2012-126 AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, GOLF ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2012
>
R2012-126 AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, GOLF ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 3:27:19 PM
Creation date
8/20/2015 3:27:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2012-126
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, GOLF ACQUISITION GROUP, LLC, D/B/A GOLF CONSTRUCTION PARKING GARAGES B & C REPAIRS PROJECT
Approved Date
6/4/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
* P . <br /> mnewell@decaturil.aov <br /> May 29, 2011 <br /> Matt Newell, P.E. <br /> City Engineer <br /> City of Decatur Public Works Department <br /> 1 Gary K. Anderson Plaza <br /> Decatur, IL 62523 <br /> Re: Parking Garage Repair Project <br /> Cost Overruns <br /> Cad Walker, Inc. Project R 1-2011-482 <br /> Dear Matt: <br /> This letter is in regard to the repair work in-progress at Garage B, as well as work scheduled to be <br /> performed at Garage C. There is currently a considerable cost-overrun, primarily due to an <br /> increased quantity of slab repairs identified during the course of the work. The following is a <br /> summary of the project to-date along with an explanation of the causes of the quantity overruns. <br /> In our evaluation report, dated December 2009, Carl Walker, Inc. made recommendations for <br /> various repairs to Garages B and C totaling $1,270,870 and $1,084,765 respectively for a total cost <br /> of $2,355,635. The project was contracted to Golf Construction for a scheduled value of $1,656,176 <br /> which, with minor exceptions, included the scope originally recommended in the Car(Walker <br /> report. The primary differences between the original cost estimate and the bid amount related to <br /> very competitive pricing submitted by Golf Construction for the concrete repair and deck coating <br /> line items. <br /> As of the latest updated survey, prepared by Golf Construction on Monday, May 21 and reviewed <br /> by Carl Walker and City Engineering Staff, there are projected adjustments in the various unit price <br /> repair item quantities that will result in a total project cost increase of$400,550. The change is <br /> primarily due to additional quantities of slab and joist repair identified in Garage B. The current <br /> projected quantities for these items have increased from the bid quantities of 1,200sf and 501f <br /> respectively to projected quantities of 8,000sf and 3001f. <br /> Given the discrepancies, we have reviewed the slab and joist repair bid quantities in order to <br /> better understand the increase. The joist quantity increase was primarily due to the replacement <br /> of the failed joist along the inside face of the roof level ramp. Although apparently sound along <br /> the exterior when struck with a hammer, it was found that the interior of the joist had experienced <br /> significant freeze-thaw damage along its length and required replacement. This also required the <br /> replacement of the curb above in order to perform the repairs. We believe there are three primary <br /> contributors to the slab repair quantity increase as follows: <br /> 1. The Engineer's survey was performed in the summer of 2009, almost three full years before <br /> the repair work commenced. During this interim period, there was on-going concrete <br /> deterioration of the structural elements, causing existing areas to grow and additional areas <br /> to form after the survey was completed. For example, if a 1'x1' repair area grows to 2'x2', it <br /> I :'� n;l ^:•�� 63('. 7:'O www.carlwolker.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.