Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> COMMON NAME: City of Decatur Zoning Ordinance <br /> GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> Hearing Date January 6, 2011 <br /> Calendar No. 10-38 <br /> Requested Action Amendments to Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance #3512) <br /> Petitioner Greg C. Crowe, Assistant City Manager <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The current City of Decatur Zoning Ordinance was adopted in May of 2002. Since the time of <br /> adoption, Staff has discovered certain necessary changes, discrepancies and omissions as the new <br /> ordinance has been implemented, specifically in SECTION XXV. SIGNAGE and SECTION XXX. <br /> ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS as well as SECTIONS IX., X., XI., and XII. in reference to Day <br /> Care Centers listed under permitted uses. It is Staff's hope that these changes will make the Zoning <br /> Ordinance more comprehensive and applicable to the changing built urban environment all the while <br /> keeping the charge of making Decatur a beautiful place to live, work and play. <br /> The first proposed amendments are related to signage permitted in the office district and for non- <br /> residential uses in the residential districts. The intent of changing the ordinance to allow larger and <br /> taller signs in these districts is to allow non-residential uses within residential districts proper signage <br /> without the need to rezone the property to a more intensive zoning. These uses are compatible with <br /> residential uses and should continue to be as such, however, it has become difficult for these uses to <br /> identify themselves with small signage while also adding the latest in technology. There is a push to <br /> rezone these residential districts to other zoning districts in order to take advantage of these taller and <br /> larger signs that allow for the technology of electronic message units. Changing the zoning may not <br /> be compatible with the surrounding area and the potential for a non-compatible use would then be <br /> created if zoning were changed. Another proposed change in the ordinance would allow a variance to <br /> be granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for electronic message unit setback to any residential <br /> district and/or residential use property/lot line. This will allow more entities the opportunity to have <br /> an electronic message unit with the approval of the Board and the opportunity for neighboring <br /> properties to be heard at a public hearing. The Zoning Board of Appeals will only be able to reduce <br /> the setback distance by 50 percent. If a variance is granted for the setback of the EMU, the entity <br /> will only be allowed to operate the sign from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. The last proposed amendment is for <br /> the change in playground size requirements for daycare centers. Day care centers are a permitted use <br /> in the R-6 Multiple Dwelling District, 0-1 Office District, B-1 Neighborhood Shopping District and <br /> the B-2 Commercial District. The intent of changing the playground requirements for daycare <br /> centers is to be in compliance with the State of Illinois Social Services Administrative Code. <br /> Currently, only part of the playground size requirements are listed in the Zoning Ordinance. The <br /> amendment will include that the size of the playground must accommodate 25 percent of the licensed <br /> capacity, along with the current Zoning Ordinance requirement of 75 square feet of playground per <br /> child. <br /> Staff recommends the following amendments: <br />