Laserfiche WebLink
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of July 1, 2010: <br /> Cal. No. 10-10 Petition of GRAND OAKS ESTATES, LLC, to rezone <br /> property located at 2225 South Mt. Zion Road from R-1 <br /> Single Family Residence District to PD Planned <br /> Development District. <br /> Chairman Anderson reminded everyone that everything that was presented in the June 3, 2010 meeting <br /> is in the minutes and will be forwarded to City Council with any additional information presented <br /> today. <br /> Mr. Greg Crowe was sworn in by Mrs. Poland. <br /> Mr. Crowe presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> Since the last Plan Commission meeting on June 3, 2010, City staff has met with the developer and <br /> their engineers regarding the rezoning petition for Grand Oaks Estate. They also have a meeting <br /> scheduled with the surrounding property owners to further discuss the petition. City staff feels the <br /> developer is taking additional steps to address some of the issues raised by the surrounding property <br /> owners. The three main issues of concern raised along with changes proposed by the petitioner are <br /> listed below: <br /> 1) Concern that the proposed stormwater detention plan is not sufficient. As was noted in the <br /> previous Plan Commission meeting the proposed plan meets all City Standards for <br /> stormwater detention. The petitioner is working with the neighbors to determine an optimal <br /> release rate for all parties involved. <br /> 2) Additional traffic congestion generated from the development. Specifically, as it relates to <br /> the additional curb cut on Route 121 and the delays from traffic turning into the <br /> development. The turning radii have been changed for the Route 121 entrance that will <br /> allow for straight, tandem and fire trucks to enter and exit the development with more ease. <br /> The north radius was increased from 15 feet to 18.5 feet and the south radius was increased <br /> from 15 feet to 40 feet. As was mentioned in the previous Plan Commission meeting <br /> IDOT will require further analysis of the entrance if they deem it is necessary. The <br /> supportive living facility is expected to generate very little traffic. The banking facility is <br /> relocating from another location on Route 121 and is not expected to generate much new <br /> traffic to Route 121. <br /> 3) General concerns of aesthetics of the area being degraded from the addition of a 3 story <br /> development without adequately provided landscaping. In the original plan the petitioner <br /> was exceeding the required landscaping points. In the newly proposed plan the petitioner <br /> has added additional landscaping in the area surrounding the memory care facility, the <br /> stormwater detention area and the south buffer yard between the 3-story supportive living <br /> facility, the bank and Mr. Casey's property. In that buffer yard, the original plan included <br /> 31 norway spruce trees (planting height of 6 feet and mature height of 30 feet) and 114 <br /> spirea and 114 buffalo juniper shrubs. The new plan includes 78 arborvitae evergreen trees <br /> (planting height of 12 feet and mature height of 30 feet) and 66 austrian pine trees (planting <br /> height of 10 feet and mature height of 50 feet). So, the new plan has converted shrubs in <br /> the buffer yard to additional evergreen trees that are taller when planted and at maturity. <br /> This should help to alleviate some of the sight concerns from the 3 story supportive living <br /> facility. <br />