My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-56 VACATING ALLEYWAY - 400 BLOCK OF SOUTH FRANKLIN STREET
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2007
>
2007-56 VACATING ALLEYWAY - 400 BLOCK OF SOUTH FRANKLIN STREET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2015 10:44:52 AM
Creation date
10/19/2015 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2007-56
Res Ord Title
VACATING ALLEYWAY - 400 BLOCK OF SOUTH FRANKLIN STREET
Approved Date
6/18/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of June 7,2007 <br /> Cal.No. 07-24 Petition of GREG C. CR WE, DIRECTOR OF <br /> ECONOMIC AND URBAN D VELOPMENT to vacate <br /> an alleyway located in the 400 Block of South Franklin <br /> Street. <br /> Ms. Suzan Stickle was sworn in by Mrs. Poland. <br /> Ms. Stickle presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> A title search was conducted earlier this year and research found that 's alleyway located in the <br /> 400 Block of South Franklin Street was never formally vacated. Thi petition request from the <br /> Economic and Urban Development Department is to formally vaca the 20 foot by 240 foot <br /> alleyway to create a clear title search in the future. The City had al owed construction on and <br /> across this alleyway in the past. <br /> The alleyway would continue to be used as it has been utilized for t e past several years. The <br /> alleyway currently has a building constructed over it where Tom y House Tires is located. <br /> Also,there are parking stalls and a driveway on the 20 foot alleyway. <br /> All utilities have been notified. The abutting property owners have een notified and have no <br /> objections to the proposed alleyway vacation. <br /> The entire West 165 feet of alleyway will continue to be the responsi ility of the property owner <br /> to the North and the entire East 75 feet of the alleyway will continu to be the responsibility of <br /> the property owner to the North and South. Both owners have b en paying taa�es and been <br /> responsible for the 20 foot alleyway for many years. <br /> The formal vacation of this alleyway will not have an adverse affect o the general public. <br /> The alleyway is not necessary to serve the general public. StafF is f the opinion that the best <br /> interests of the City of Decatur would be served by approving the alle ay vacation. <br /> A motion to forward the vacation request of Calendar Number 07-24 to the City Council with a <br /> recommendation of approval is suggested. <br /> Mr.Nordholm asked if the vacation was more than the 400 block of outh Franklin. Ms. Stickle <br /> replied that the alleyway ran east — west in the 400 block of Sout Franklin. Mr. Nordholm <br /> questioned if the property owners thought they owned the property. Ms. Stickle stated yes and <br /> they have also been paying taxes on it. <br /> Mr. Steve John asked if the City had done some type of asses ment of the property and <br /> questioned why the City was not asking for payment of the alleyway. Ms. Stickle stated the City <br /> is not sure if this property was vacated earlier and the paperwork is missing. The property <br /> owners have been paying taxes on it along with maintaining it. The have also been allowed to <br /> build and pave on it. This vacation will just be paperwork as the rec rds show they already have <br /> ownership. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Nordholm/Anderson) to forward Cal. N . 07-24 to the City Council <br /> with the recommendation for approval as presented. Motion carried animously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.