My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-64 PARTIALLY VACATING AN EASEMENT - MOUND CENTER
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2006
>
2006-64 PARTIALLY VACATING AN EASEMENT - MOUND CENTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2015 10:37:43 AM
Creation date
10/20/2015 10:37:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2006-64
Res Ord Title
PARIALLY VACATING AN EASEMENT - MOUND CENTER
Approved Date
7/17/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from Decatur City Plan Commission July 6, 2006. <br /> Cal. No. 06-40 Petition of DANE C. BRAGG, Assistant City Manager <br /> to vacate easement at 3795 U.S. Route North Mound <br /> Center. ' <br /> It was moved and seconded(Anderson/Tom Smith)to take Cal. No.06-40 off the table. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Greg Crowe was sworn in by Ms. Jesse. <br /> Mr. Crowe presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> As part of the Mound Center subdivision, a watermain and utility easement was dedicated <br /> on the south property line of Lot Four (4). AT&T is utilizing the easement for its cable; <br /> no other utility companies have located any utilities in the easement. <br /> The watermain for the site has been relocated and a new easement has been dedicated. <br /> The partial vacation will restrict the use of the easement to AT&T. Further use of the <br /> easement by another utility company will not be allowed. <br /> Since AT&T is utilizing the easement, construction of permanent buildings will not be <br /> allowed in the easement. <br /> Staff is of the opinion that the best interests of the City of Decatur would be served by <br /> approving the request to partially vacate the easement as indicated on the plat. Staff <br /> recommends approval of the petition. <br /> There were no obj ectors. <br /> It was moved and seconded(Anderson/Dunn)to forward Cal.No. 06-40 to the City <br /> Council with the recommendation for approval as submitted by the petitioner. Motion <br /> carried with Steve John abstaining. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.