My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2006-137 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2006
>
R2006-137 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:33:14 PM
Creation date
11/2/2015 2:33:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2006-137
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT HEALTH PLAN CONSULTANT REVIEW - THE SEGAL COMPANY
Approved Date
9/5/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> '� SEGAL <br /> THE SEGAL COMPANY <br /> 101 North Wacker Drive. Suite 500 Chicago, IL 60606-1724 <br /> T312.98�.8500 F 312 984.8590 www seyalco.com <br /> August 30, 2006 <br /> VIA E-MAIL <br /> The Honorable Paul Osborne <br /> Mayor <br /> City of Decatur <br /> One Gary K. Anderson Plaza <br /> Decatur, IL, 62523 <br /> Re: Health Plan Consultant Review <br /> Dear Mayor Osborne: <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to describe how Segal can assist the City of Decatur, Illinois (the City) <br /> with a review of your current employee health programs. We have conducted many comparable analyses <br /> for other clients who wish to identify the cost drivers of their health plan. As a firm serving a number of <br /> public sector organizations, we have a deep appreciation for how difficult it is to ensure that employees <br /> and their families receive the most valuable benefits during a time of escalating healthcare inflation <br /> compounded by budget constraints, limited financial resources and increasing public accountability. <br /> Through discussion with City staff, we were requested to address the three elements enumerated in the I, <br /> "Request for Proposals for an Audit of Administration of the City of Decatur's Self-Insured Group Health <br /> Program" issued in June 2006, namely: I <br /> 1. Should the City remain self-insured? <br /> 2. Is the selection process for the program third party administrator equitable? , <br /> 3. Is the third party administrator accurately administering the plan? <br /> In this correspondence, we offer our approach to address numbers 1 and 3 listed above. Specifically, our <br /> proposed Funding Analysis will assist the City in making a determination about the best funding <br /> structure, based on the City's ability and desire to take on risk and the City's past healthcare experience. <br /> This analysis will focus on the City's current reserves and future reserve requirements. The Claims Audit <br /> we propose will evaluate the performance of the City's TPA in administering the Health Plan against the <br /> Plan Document, Summary Plan Description,and best practices. <br /> We are not presenting a proposal to address item number 2 above. An analysis of the selection process of <br /> the City's TPA would require market data to review the various options available and to independently <br /> validate the choice of Consociate at the time of that initiative. This data is no longer available. We <br /> believe a forward rather than retrospective review of the Health Plan's PPO will be most valuable to assist <br /> the City in future decisions. <br /> Benefits,Compensation and HR Consulting ATLANTA BOSTON CHICAGO CLEVELAND DENVER HARTFORD HOUSTON LOS ANGELES <br /> MINNEAPOLIS NEW ORLEANS NEW YORK PHILADELPHIA PHOENIX SAN FRANCISCO SEATTLE TORONTO WASHINGTON,D.C. <br /> Rt�; G <br /> Multinational Group of Actuaries and Consultants AMSTERDAM BARCELONA GENEVA HAMBURG JOHANNESBURG LONDON MELBOURNE <br /> ``���`� MEXICO CITY OSLO PARIS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.