Laserfiche WebLink
The Honorable Paul Osborne <br /> ' City of Decatur <br /> August 30, 2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> We also offer an Evaluation of Current Vendors in response to direction by the City Council in our <br /> discussions at the August 21, 2006 meeting. This process will provide insight into the most appropriate <br /> health care delivery structure to ensure the City is maximizing the services of its existing providers in a <br /> most cost efficient program. <br /> This proposal summarizes our understanding of the City's current situation, describes Segal's approach to <br /> each project and the resulting deliverables, presents associated fees, and provides an overview of our firm <br /> and the services we offer. <br /> OUR UNDERSTANDING <br /> It is our understanding that the City provides employees with a healthcare plan that is self-funded and <br /> administered by the third party administrator, Consociate Dansig. Consociate also has developed the PPO <br /> network currently utilized by the City. Three plan design options are offered, varying primarily by the <br /> amount of deductible and co-pays that apply to each. Incentives for a healthy lifestyle (related to non- <br /> smokers and appropriate weight, blood pressure and cholesterol levels) are also tied to varying <br /> deductibles and employee contribution rates. The City pays the majority of the premium equivalent costs <br /> for single and family coverage for bargained employees. Management employees pay a higher <br /> contribution toward the premium. <br /> The City spends approximately $3.4 million annually in medical claims. The health plan is currently <br /> well-funded. However, claims fluctuations in past years have put a strain on the City and have created <br /> concern among Council Members and staff. This has led to their interest in engaging a consulting firm to <br /> conduct an independent review and assessment of the health benefit program. <br /> AREAS OF REVIEW <br /> The City seeks an independent review and assessment of the health benefit plan offered to employees and <br /> the work performed by its current TPA,including particular concentration of the following areas: �I <br /> � Funding Analysis � <br /> ❑ Are the health plan reserves at appropriate levels for the short-and long-term? <br /> � Should the health plan remain self-funded, or is the City's risk position such that options, <br /> including a partially self-insured or fully insured plan structure, should be considered? <br /> � Evaluation of Current Vendors <br /> _] Are the existing health care vendors (i.e., Consociate Dansig as TPA and PPO network, and <br /> Express Scripts as PBM) the most appropriate providers for the City? <br /> �J Is the current TPA structure the most cost advantageous option for the City? <br /> � Is the City maximizing its contractual arrangement options with existing vendors? <br /> � Are the City's existing contractual arrangements with vendors competitive with those of <br /> regional comparators? <br />