My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2006-93 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2006
>
R2006-93 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 8:22:16 AM
Creation date
11/3/2015 8:22:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2006-93
Res Ord Title
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT THAT INSIGHT COMMUNICATION MIDWEST LLC'S FRANCHISE SHOULD NOT BE RENEWED
Approved Date
7/3/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pa�e Section # Section Name Comments <br /> Tl-' l� 11 1. +' 1,1' +'., � , .7.- ., ..,, *1, <br /> R'iITG-v'D7T�RCr �`v`v'j u�v � <br /> C on..r.4..L'i•.r•ra •J .. <br /> � <br /> �wizvrcuxzivirrrrcm. {' •7 +l, �ic�cs'_;.tt.� �I <br /> , r � <br /> a ♦ '� 1 .7' +' TL.o �;1„�-o t.�.ro�l�n <br /> -- - r <br /> � I <br /> � � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> ' f' 1� 1, 11 �l, 1 � ••4'si"'zci-Qcnaur� <br /> � <br /> Tl, 11 �' „ 1...!'';t�> ..�.,,,...a.,,,-,.,..o <br /> J J J U <br /> f 7 <br /> f � <br /> �}�� <br /> City's Determination: <br /> Insight has proposed to completely eliminate any security <br /> fund requirement leaving the City with little or no remedy <br /> for ongoing enforcement. This directly conflicts with the <br /> " City's identified needs ands interests set forth in the needs <br /> assessment. Presumably Insight is suggesting that in lieu of <br /> a$50,000 security fund a$100,000 bond will be maintained <br /> thi�oughout the term of the Ordinanc�. However, a s�curity <br /> fund is far more accessible for routine noncompliance <br /> matters and Insight has provided no explanation why it was <br /> eliminated. Further, Insight provides no information that the <br /> provision of a$50,000 security fund is unreasonable based <br /> on the costs associated with meeting this obligation. <br /> In addition, Insight completely eliminated the entire <br /> enforcement procedure and replaced it with an <br /> extraordinarily burdensome and time consuming procedure <br /> which contemplates a process that may extend more than <br /> ninety(90)days and require the designation of a separa.te <br /> hearing officer to enforce the Ordinance. Insight's proposal <br /> also seeks to impose a waiver of rights on the City by <br /> limiting the City to a single remedy should Insight continue <br /> to materially violate the terms of the Ordinance. Once again, <br /> Insight provides no explanation or rationale for its proposed <br /> revisions nor an reference or ex lanation re ardin wh the <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.