My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2006-93 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2006
>
R2006-93 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 8:22:16 AM
Creation date
11/3/2015 8:22:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2006-93
Res Ord Title
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT THAT INSIGHT COMMUNICATION MIDWEST LLC'S FRANCHISE SHOULD NOT BE RENEWED
Approved Date
7/3/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page Section # Section Name Comments <br /> Buildings Internet access�=-service to each public and private <br /> school in the City, including Millikin University and <br /> Richland Community College,provided such schools are <br /> passed within t�ee-one hundred�98-twentv-five (125) feet <br /> by Grantee's distribution cable. <br /> City's Determination: <br /> See comment above for Section 6.2(a)with respect to 300 <br /> foot drop length. <br /> 22 7 Institutional Insights' s Proposal: I <br /> Network Provisions This entire section has been deleted. I <br /> City's Determination: <br /> The City's Formal Needs Assessment Report at Exhibit C— <br /> Connectivity Report, dated August 12, 2004,outlines the <br /> City's needs and interests with respect to the provision of <br /> institutional network services. Insight's proposal is to <br /> completely eliminate any reference or requirement for an <br /> institutional network within the City. Insight provides no <br /> analysis regarding whether the costs associated with meeting <br /> this need render it unreasonable. In fact, Insight provides no <br /> financial information with respect to the costs associated <br /> with an institutional network nor its relationship to Insight's <br /> current finances. Insight's only statexnent is that it estimates <br /> the cost to build the institutional network to be$lmillion. <br /> Specifically, Insight provided no projections nor a�ry <br /> breakdown of its current financial position to demonstrate <br /> that all or a portion of the institutional network would render <br /> rates unreasonable. <br /> Insight relies entirely on a survey conducted by Talmey- <br /> Drake arguing that subscribers do not wish to pay for the <br /> institutional network. Insight then argues that the cost <br /> therefore outweighs the need or interest and therefore Insight <br /> has not included construction of an institutional network as <br /> part of its proposal. Insight appears to reply on its own <br /> needs assessment which varies dramatically from the needs <br /> assessment specifically approved by the City Council as <br /> required under the Cable Act and upon which Insight's <br /> proposal is to be measured. <br /> Both the Cable Act and case law make cleaz that it is the <br /> Ci 's obli ation to assess its future needs and interests and <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.