My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2002-168A AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2002
>
R2002-168A AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2016 3:29:50 PM
Creation date
1/14/2016 3:29:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2002-168A
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT JOINT UTILITY LOCATING INFORMATION FOR EXCAVATORS
Approved Date
9/16/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> � This decision is complicated by the fact that the service is a 24/7 type activity. Preliminary <br /> thoughts were that the requests could be received at the City's South Water Treatment Plant as <br /> it is staffed 24 hours a day. <br /> The staffing for this activity is another major variable. Two basic options were considered for <br /> the City taking on this responsibility. The first is to dedicate staff members to this activity with <br /> utility locates being their primary responsibility. The second option would have the City <br /> essentially continue in somewhat the same manner that it has been making locates. In either <br /> case, it was estimated that the workload involved in formalizing the locate activities equaled a <br /> minimum of two full-time employees. This was based on the time associated to receive, <br /> process, make the field locates and document approximately 5,300 requests per year. It was <br /> not considered practical to expect this workload to be absorbed into the existing staffing level <br /> without adversely impacting other services and programs. <br /> The option of adding permanent full-time staff was considered. If finro full-time staff positions <br /> were added to accommodate the estimated additional workload, this would not fully meet all of <br /> the expected workload associated with this new program. Existing staff would need to provide <br /> supervision, support clerical duties and backup during times of heavy workloads or during <br /> absences of the designated staff in the event of ineetings, training, vacation, illness or other <br /> reasons. <br /> Both in-house options have costs in addition to personnel. These additional costs include <br /> vehicles, equipment, materials and supplies. Trying to reasonably budget and plan for this <br /> program is difficult given the limited firsthand experience of staff and available information from <br /> others. Starting and committing to such a program represents a significant level of investment <br /> in resources to implement, operate and administer this program. City staff is not comfortable <br /> with undertaking this program in-house given the unknowns and variables. <br /> It is City staff's recommendation that this should be a contracted service much as Illinois Power <br /> and other utilities do. Contracting the service is considered to represent a number of benefits to <br /> the City. The primary benefit is that the City is able to join JULIE to satisfy State Law and <br /> implement this program with minimal impacts to its existing operations. Another benefit is that <br /> the City's liability is reduced by having a private company do the utility locates. The company <br /> will rely on information provided by the City. If the City's information is incorrect, the company <br /> may not be held liable for mislocating an utility. However, it is likely a City employee would use <br /> the same information and make the same mistake. In addition, this program is of an on-call, <br /> year-around nature, but is subject to daily and seasonal fluctuation. If the City were doing the <br /> locates, the additional work assignments to its employees would have to be of the nature that <br /> allows interruption with minimum loss of productivity. <br /> After deciding to contract for this service, City staff searched to find companies providing locate <br /> services to solicit proposals from. This search included contacting JULIE to ask about <br /> companies doing this type of work in the Decatur area. JULIE informed staff that there was 3 <br /> companies providing that type of service in the area. Staff contacted these companies to ask <br /> about their interest in providing service to the City. Two companies declined a request to <br /> submit a proposal. Great Plains Locate Service (GPLS) indicated that it would submit a <br /> proposal. Based on the responses that City staff received, the decision was made to not <br /> advertise for proposals. City staff contacted GPLS directly, as it is considered a reputable <br /> locate service company in central Illinois and negotiated an agreement with GPLS to provide <br /> this service for the City. A copy of the agreement is attached. The agreement is renewable on <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.