My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2001-216 AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2001
>
R2001-216 AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2026 10:05:30 AM
Creation date
1/21/2016 11:14:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2001-216
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AGREEMENT - CENTRAL PARK FOUNTAIN
Approved Date
11/26/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Decatur � <br /> Central Park Fountain Project Cost Summary � <br /> Original Base 2/00 Bid Revised Base Bid Included in Revised Bid Increase/(Reduce)Project Cost <br /> Cost $ 455,962 403,277 <br /> 1. A/E Costs $ 37,600 NO 37,600 <br /> 2. Outside Consultant $ 10,360 NO 10,360 <br /> 3. Reimbursables $ 3,166 NO 3,166 <br /> 4. Construction Observation $ 15,000 15,000 NO 15,000 <br /> 5. Landscaping $ 14,000 14,000 NO 14,000 <br /> 6. Demolition $ 21,500 21.500 NO 21,500 <br /> Fountain Subtotal $ 455,962 504,903 101,626 <br /> Additional Necessary Project Costs <br /> 7. Sidewalk Replacement $ 53,544' S3,544' NO 53,544 <br /> 8. Sewer Replacement $ 25,1002 25,1002 NO 25,100 <br /> 9. Park Seating $ 8,7163 8,7163 NO 8,716 <br /> 10. Sidewalk Li ting� $ 7,500' 7,5004 NO 7,500 <br /> Additional Costs Subtotal $ 94,860 94,860 NO 94,860 <br /> Total Fountain Project Costs $ 550,822 599,763 <br /> Total Raised by Osborne <br /> Fountain Committee $ 150,000 150,000 <br /> City of Decatur Contribution $ 350,040 350,000 <br /> Total Fountain Project <br /> Unfunded Balance $ 50,822 99,763 <br /> 1. Alternate#9 from the original bid form. Alternate#9 was the lowest cost option for walkway construction/replacement. <br /> 2. Alternate#5 from the original bid form. It is assumed the City would not construct a$500,000+fountain on top of/to be serviced by an aging sewer. <br /> 3. Alternate#3 from the original bid form. This was shown as a deduct as both responsive bidders would have declined to offer the seating. <br /> 4. City staff estimate for 10 Oakwood style vintage streetlight units, exclusive of labor and/or other required electrical materials. Source: Sternberg Vintage Lighting catalo€ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.