Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum#01-121 � <br /> 11/23/O1 <br /> Page-2- <br /> • Item #8 - Sewer Replacement. It is reasonable to assume that the existing sewer ' <br /> would need to be replaced. Sewers, like any other capital improvement, require <br /> maintenance andJor replacement. The wisdom of constructing a $500,000+ fountain <br /> to be serviced by an aging sewer would be questionable at best. This cost was also <br /> taken from the original bid sheet. <br /> • Items 9 & 10 - Park Seating and Sidewalk Lighting. Again, given what has been <br /> presented relative to the appeal and attraction of the new fountain, it would seem <br /> reasonable that the City would want to provide adequate seating and lighting to <br /> accommodate Central Park/fountain visitors. The seating cost was taken from the <br /> original bid sheet and the lighting cost is City staff estimate for 10 Oakwood style <br /> vintage lights. <br /> • Tota1 Fountain Project Costs. This reflects City sta�s estimate of potential total project <br /> costs. Note: While this number is truly an estimate it is likely a conservative one. Some of <br /> the figures used were e�racted from the original bid sheet and are approaching two years old. <br /> City staff estimates this total project cost to be $599,763. <br /> • Total Raised by Osborne Fountain Committee. T'his reflects the total amount of private <br /> contributions/pledges as per Paul Osborne. <br /> • City of Decatur Contribution. While historically the funding for this project was contemplated <br /> to be a 50/50 match, City Council recently indicated it may be willing to provide up to <br /> $350,000. <br /> • Total Fountain Project Unfunded Balance. This figure represents City sta�s best estimate of <br /> the potential funding shortfall that currently exists; $99,763. <br /> While some of the figures may be subject to change, it is City staff s position that what they point <br /> out is the need to consider the total project cost prior to the execution of any fountain rela.ted <br /> agreements. The report prepared by Architectural Expressions underestima.ted the cost of the <br /> fountain project by not including items required for the successful construction and operation of a <br /> Central Park fountain. <br />'� INPUT FROM OTHER SOURCES: <br />' Attached to this memorandum is the fountain cost summary report as prepared by City staff. <br /> STAFF REFERENCE: <br /> contact A.J. Krie er 424-2727 <br /> If Council members have questions they may g , , <br /> ajkrie er ,decaturnet.org. <br />