My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2001-115 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2001
>
R2001-115 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2016 9:27:18 AM
Creation date
1/22/2016 9:27:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2001-115
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TRANSIT RESOURCE CENTER
Approved Date
6/18/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� M_ ., <br /> ' I <br /> BID SUMMARY and EVALUATION <br /> INVITATION FOR BIDS <br /> FOR <br /> POST-DELIVERY AUDIT <br /> CITY OF DECATUR, ILLINOIS <br /> BIDDING DEADLINE: Bids were received unti12:00 P.M., Central Time, on June 8, 2001. <br /> 12. BID EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS - The evaluation of bids will be <br /> conducted by the Mass Transit Administrator and other City staff inembers, as deemed necessary. <br /> Bids first will be reviewed to determine conformance with the requirements delineated in this IFB. <br /> The best bid for this project shall be determined based on the qualifications of the bidder and the <br /> amount of the bid submitted. Each submitted bid will receive a score based on a weighted <br /> evaluation formula, shown below. The successful bidder,pending formal approval, will be the <br /> company that receives the highest aggregate evaluation score, and, in the opinion of the City, is <br /> determined to be in the best interest of the City. <br /> The evaluation criteria and their approximate percentage of the total evaluation score are as <br /> follows: <br /> 1. The firm's demonstrated understanding of the <br /> project and the firm's role.............................................................10% <br /> 2. The firm's approach to the project, including <br /> other tasks proposed by the firm..................................................10% <br /> 3. The qualifications of the key personnel to be <br /> assigned to this project.................................................................10% <br /> 4. Availability of key personnel and the firm's ability <br /> to complete the work tasks in a timely manner............................10% <br /> 5. The firm's (and proposed subcontractor's) <br /> past experience with similar projects...........................................20% <br /> 6. The amount of the bid..................................................................40% <br /> TOTAL...........................................................................................100% <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.