Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> , , '� Page 2 of 2 <br /> South Creek Living Center <br /> July 9, 2002 <br /> a. The new plan reduces the density of the approved 1989 plan from 32 units to 30 units. The <br /> petitioner proposes the construction of one duplex and four four-plex senior citizen independent <br /> living units, i.e. 18 units in the north half of the property. The proposed design for the units <br /> follows the existing first phase of the development. <br /> b. The petitioner proposes access to the development from South Franklin Street,rather than from <br /> Enlow Drive. A short cul-de-sac street will serve the five buildings of the development. <br /> 5. The petitioner proposes retaining the existing wooded area to the north of the development, abutting <br /> Enlow Drive,without disturbing the existing drainage ditch and treeline. However,due to the <br /> necessary grading for the street and the buildings,the remaining trees on the site must be removed. <br /> The northeast portion of the lot will be used as a retention pond area(see attached Landscape Plan). <br /> The petitioner proposes utilizing the existing ditches and slopes on site for storm drainage. <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> 6. The proposed development is of lower density than the previously approved RDP. In addition,the <br /> access off of South Franklin Street through a cul-de-sac,will minimize the effect of the development <br /> on the surrounding residential neighborhood. The architectural character of the buildings will be the <br /> same as the original phase,which has shown to blend in well with the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> 7. Retaining the existing trees and creek along Enlow Drive will preserve the wooded character of the <br /> site for residents to the north. Staff finds that the proposed landscaping treatment provides sufficient <br /> buffering for the site as well as a pleasant environment for residents. <br /> STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 8. The proposed development is in conformance with the Decatur Urban Land Use Plan,and staff <br /> believes that,together with the existing condominiums to the south of the subject site,the <br /> development will enhance the area. Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval of the <br /> petition as presented. <br /> PLAN COMMISSION ACTION <br /> 1. Section XXIX. G.1. of the 2002 Ordinance requires the Plan Commission to hold a public hearing on <br /> requests for an amendment for a Planned Unit Development. A motion to approve the proposed PUD <br /> amendment is recommended. <br /> The above report constitutes the testimony and recommendation of the Planning Division,Economic and <br /> Urban Development Department, City of Decatur. <br /> Hala Ahmed,AICP <br /> Environmental Specialist <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> 1. Location Map. <br /> 2. Petition. <br />