My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-68 AMENDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - 125 ENLOW DRIVE - SOUTH CREEK LIVING CENTER
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2002
>
2002-68 AMENDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - 125 ENLOW DRIVE - SOUTH CREEK LIVING CENTER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 9:39:04 AM
Creation date
3/1/2016 9:39:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2002-68
Res Ord Title
AMENDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - 125 ENLOW DRIVE - SOUTH CREEK LIVING CENTER
Approved Date
8/5/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpts from City Plan Commission Minutes of July 9, 2002 <br /> Cal. No. 02-32 Petition of SOUTH CREEK LIVING CENTER, L.L.C., 125 Enlow <br /> Drive, to amend the Planned Unit Development in an R-5 District. <br /> Mr. Van Steenhuyse presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> The proposed development,which covers 3.21 acres, is located at the corner ofEnlow Drive and <br /> South Franklin Street. The property is currently vacant and is heavily wooded. The subject site <br /> is the second phase of a Residential Development Plan(RDP)that was approved in October 1989 <br /> (Ordinance No. 89-39). The first phase,which occupies the south 313 feet of the lot and consists <br /> of 12 units/condominiums, was completed in 1992. The original plan had a total of 32 senior <br /> citizen independent living units arranged along a north-south street betweenEnlow and Imboden <br /> Drives. However, the original developer chose to construct only 12 units on the south property, <br /> accessed by a cul-de-sac from Imboden. This change was approved as a minor change to the <br /> original RDP. <br /> Previously, in March 2002, the petitioner submitted a petition to allow the construction of a <br /> 54-unit assisted living facility. The petitioner subsequently withdrew that petition from the April <br /> Plan Commission agenda. <br /> The petitioner requests the amendment of the previously approved RDP due to the following <br /> changes in the proposed development: <br /> a. The new plan reduces the density of the approved 1989 plan from 32 units to 30 units. <br /> The petitioner proposes the construction of one duplex and four four-plex senior <br /> citizen independent living units, i.e. 18 units in the north half of the property. The <br /> proposed design for the units follows the existing first phase of the development <br /> b. The petitioner proposes access to the development from South Franklin Street, rather <br /> than from Enlow Drive. A short cul-de-sac street will serve the five buildings of the I <br /> development. , <br /> The petitioner proposes retaining the existing wooded area to the north of the development, I', <br /> abutting Enlow Drive,without disturbing the existing drainage ditch and tree line. However, due <br /> to the necessary grading for the street and the buildings, the remaining trees on the site must be <br /> removed. The northeast portion of the lot will be used as a retention pond area. The petitioner , <br /> proposes utilizing the existing ditches and slopes on site for storm drainage. � <br /> The proposed development is of lower density than the previously approved RDP. In addition, <br /> the access off of South Franklin Street through a cul-de-sac,will minimize the effect of the <br /> development on the surrounding residential neighborhood. The architectural character of the <br /> buildings will be the same as the original phase,which has shown to blend in well with the <br /> surrounding neighborhood. Retaining the existing trees and creek alongEnlow Drive will <br /> preserve the wooded character of the site for residents to the north. Staff finds that the proposed <br /> landscaping treatment provides sufficient buffering for the site as well as a pleasant environment <br /> for residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.