Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. John asked the location of the entrance. Mr. Kelly stated that it would be off Pershing Road. <br /> It was noted that U-turns did not look safe there. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that would be part <br /> of the review of the site plan. I <br /> Mr. Shampine asked if petitioner agreed with stipulations as noted by staff and Mr. Kelly <br /> answered yes. <br /> There was an objector present: <br /> Mrs. Yvonne Causey, 2919 North 25th, was present and spoke against the petition. Her side yard <br /> is adjacent to the back yard of the subject property. Mrs. Causey expressed concern with fencing, <br /> traffic, lighting and the possibility of her property value decreasing. <br /> Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that fencing is required per the ordinance to provide screening. The <br /> fence can be constructed of wood or it could be metal with vinyl inserts. Mr. Van Steenhuyse <br /> stated that the effect on the values of the surrounding properties could not be predicted. The use <br /> will be as an office during the day and the impact should not be significant. <br /> Mr. Kelly stated that a six foot wooden, stained fence would be constructed. Mrs. Causey asked <br /> about lighting. Mr. Van Steenhuyse stated that the ordinance does not allow their lighting to spill <br /> over onto the property of others. <br /> Mr. Schiller stated that the four foot fence does not seem adequate adjacent to a residential area <br /> and asked if that could be reviewed in the new ordinance. <br /> It was moved and seconded (Schiller/Peck) to forward Cal. No. O1-09 to City Council with <br /> recommendation for approval as presented with the stipulation of a six foot wooden sight break <br /> fence. Motion carried unanimously. <br />