Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � . � <br /> Newell stated that a four-way stop would not address that either. There are other things that <br /> could be looked at to address this problem. A traffic circle or diverter could be installed. <br /> Ballard stated that the people on the street would be opposed to diverters. <br /> Mr. Works believes that stop signs on the side streets would defeat the purpose, because Leafland <br /> would be a straight shot to Woodford and the speeds would increase. <br /> Moore asked if traffic calming devices could be installed, like four-inch speed bumps, to slow <br /> speeds at an intersection. If stop signs do not do what they are supposed to do, could that be an <br /> alternative? <br /> Newell advised these bumps would have to be put down every 200 or 300 feet to be effective. <br /> The best way to address the cut-through traffic problem would be with diverters or a traffic circle. <br /> If traffic counters are put out again, the counts would be about what they were the first time. He <br /> believes the speeds will be about the same. It would be different if they are down on a Sunday <br /> because of Church traffic, but even then the volumes would be lower on a Sunday. <br /> The vote on the motion was seven ayes and one nay(Newell). The motion carried. <br /> The item will be taken to City Council. Newell will notify the residents of the date. <br />