Laserfiche WebLink
� where he or she is, and Facilitating a call diroubh the nearest service operator and cell site. �i <br /> An here . i <br /> call routin and ori ination also kn ' � <br /> Y�' g g , own as seamlcss roarnm�, �s dcpendent upon all PCS o�crato�s <br /> . , . r , <br /> cooperating in providing subscnber informat�on to each other and in establishing agreements to support each other's ' <br /> customers. Many cellular service providers presently have iimited interoperability agreements for roamino within tlie , <br /> US. internationally, a recent agreement between GTE Personal Communications Services and Deutsche Telekom <br /> Mobilfunk promises to provide roaming in 31 countries. j <br /> In many cases, celluiar telephone service has become the model for PCS. At least initially, it is very likely that PCS I <br /> will be a competitive service similar to cellular telepl�one service. Yet, sorne of tl�e large companies like AT��CT and <br /> Sprint, Pacific Telesis, and others wl�o }�ave recently participated in the PCS broadband auctions look at PCS as a <br /> means to get into wireiess telephony to bypass local wired telephone service providers. Od�ers like the consortium of I <br /> regionai Bell operating companies (EZI30Cs)called PCS Primeco seek simply to protect existing markcts a►id expand <br /> where possible. <br /> Companies who i�ave existing cellular operations need additional licenses in areas not covered by d�eir cellular <br /> systems to establish a nationa( "footprint". A national footprint is valuable because it generates revenucs direcdy to <br /> tlie Frm and cuts out middlemen in reciprocal service agreements. AT&T's strategy is an example of tliis. <br /> Otl�er telecommunications companies, including competitive access providers (CAPs), look at PCS as an alternate <br /> means to get into local telephone service. CAPs are companies who want to provide competitive locai telepl�one <br /> service,rather than long-distance. Local telephone service is still protected as a monopoly in many states, but this is <br /> changing rapidly. PCS systems are being designed tl�at facilitate lower-cost fixed radio access as an alternative to <br /> wired local telephone systems. There is strong potential in tliis market given tl�e consumer dissatisfaction witli <br /> current local telephone service providers. <br /> Pacific Telesis is a regional telephone company for Califomia. As tlie long-term impacts of PCS are likely to E�ull <br /> customers away from wired telephone systems, Paciftc'['elesis has a vested interest in retaining and protectirig its <br /> existing base of customers. Company president and CEO, Lyn Daniels, even went so far as to publicly promise to <br /> outbid any PCS auction participant for iicenses in California and Nevada, states in which it l�as wired operations. <br /> Many ceilular operators recognize PCS as a competitive technology. Witl� tl�e first ful(-fledged operationnl I'CS <br /> system not expected until mid-1996,cellular carriers are►noving now to lower dieir mond�l�charges to ctistomers <br /> and to improve their technology. Today, cellular telephone syste►ns use t(ie analog Advanced Mobile Pl�one System <br /> (AMPS) radio interface standard. Many like AT&T Wireless (formerly McCaw Communications)I�ave begun <br /> promoting digital AMPS,or D-AMPS, and odiers are e:cploring Code Division Multiple Access(CDNin). <br /> Since there are no other comparabie services like PCS, past cellular telephone industry trends have becorne tl�e basis <br /> for projecting PCS future trends. This is done even in some cases where tl�e service provided is significaritly <br /> different from existing cellular telepf�one service. Most business proposals include reference to t}ie l�istorical <br /> penetration rate of cellular, which is approximately 7 percent after 10 years. <br /> In spite of all die references to cellular, PCS sl�ould be considered distinctly different. PCS must be viewed in terms <br /> of what it offers in vision and in technology diat cellular cant�ot. <br /> --.._. _._. __..__... _.._ . . _...._........----._......._.___ .._ _ -- - <br /> The Benefits of PCS Over Cellular <br /> PCS has several advantages over existing cellular telephone service. They ir�clude better service quality tl�rougli use <br /> of digital technology, more compact radio interface equipment, increased mobility, enhanced service feflttires, and <br /> price. All of these are discussed bclow. <br /> First, PCS will utilize d�e Iatest digital technology. Digital radio interface equipment will facilitate cleaner voice <br /> quality but, more importantly,clean data communication. In fact, a PCS customer will be able to commut�icate <br /> through voice and data simultaneously using the same handset without interference to either activity. <br /> Digitul technology also facilitates greater compression and higher data transfer rates. So, computer users operating <br /> remotely will be ab(e to run applications and retrieve data faster. Tl�is has important implications to certnin <br /> businesses that support field operations. Consider a plumbing business that not only sends work orders to pl�irnbers <br /> in the field but enables Joe Plumber under a sink to check inventory for pipe fittings. <br /> A second importflnt aspect of PCS is die improvement in equipment. PCS will �itilize smaller antennas and rtiore <br /> advanced telecommunications technology that, in effect, will be cl�eaper. Advances in tecltnology I�ave even liad <br /> some manufacturers claim that they can put up radio interface equipment for PCS d�at is a fraction of tl�e cost of <br /> RODIGY �D P1eb Hrowsers Specific Information on PCS (http://www.cyberpeak.com/PC3/PCS_�pec.litm) PTqr � <br /> . . , .,.T � . .. . . . . ........ . <br />