My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2000-67 AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000
>
R2000-67 AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2016 10:18:47 AM
Creation date
4/6/2016 10:18:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2000-67
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT OR CONTRACTS - NEAR NORTH REDEVELOPMENT AREA - CBR URBAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Approved Date
5/8/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPACE, REDEVELOPMENT AND THE NEW DEVELOPMENT PERIOD: <br /> Befc�re we can begir� to discuss the targeted economic development plan for Decatur, it is first <br /> essential to further explore the status and condition of affected people, interwoven with the over- <br /> all and hnlistic physical changes and redevelopment which have taken place in the city. <br /> 1 am a life-long resident of Decatur and have watched it grow into a highly productive site, one <br /> bearing national and intemational significance. The economic lifeblood of Decatur has been, in <br /> large part, its continued and incr�ased investment in structural/physical redevelopment. Eventu- <br /> ally, however, large tracts of vacant land were gone, having been absorbed by major manufactur- <br /> ers and other businesses. <br /> Next, I witnessed land developments pushing outward, creating prosperous peripheral areas, <br /> having the eifect of declining worth and value of traditional central city neighborhoods—invest- <br /> ment was tilted out and away from the central business district and the inner city in order to <br /> build, rebuild, improve and maintain. The result has been a constant magnetic pull of people, <br /> skills, talent and treasures from inner city communities to outlining and peripheral enclaves, re- <br /> sulting in their becoming depopulated, poor and deteriorated — investment was withheld and <br /> economic obsolescence and physical deterioration accelerated. <br /> Inner city areas of Decatur began to loose their luster in relation to other more choice areas. <br /> Houses began to age, failed to be structuraily rehabilitated, and would begin to be inhabited by <br /> home seekers with lower incomes. Former single and muiti-family dwelling units were converted <br /> into commercial uses. Commercial spaces saw a downward spiral in rents,quality and prestige. <br /> Between 1970 and 1980, 1 saw Decatur de-emphasize the maintenance of the densely developed <br /> working-class cottages of the inner city in favor of promoting life in the suburbs, which repre- <br /> sented the new life of economic security, progress, leisure, and consumption. Not seeing the <br /> blade of the economic axe descending on its downward arch, inner city people were unable to <br /> detect that retaii trade began to follow affluence and that many of the retail firms began to blend <br /> their places of business within the newly formed `�uburds." (A classic example was Decatur's <br /> twenty five year practice, 1946-71, of building and locating shopping centers in peripheral areas, <br /> just outside the central business district and the inner city.) Surrounded by affluence and pros- <br /> perity,the inner city of the Decatur would become the only place open to the poor. <br /> Decatur's central city#aced an unprecedented crisis during the 1980s. Depleted of its resources <br /> (erosion of job opportunities in the industrial base brought on by financial restructuring, discov- <br /> eries/changes in technology, the introduction of the microprocessor into production, communi- <br /> cation and financial transactions, and the emergence of a worid economy), disadvantaged by <br /> aged and obsotete infrastructure, and strapped with an increasingly dependent and dangerous <br /> population, redevelopment and reinvestment in central city spaces were essential to recovery. <br /> Because of technologicaUeconomic displacement, middle ciass residents—with their incomes, <br /> skilis and other access to resources—are the centerpieces for the inner city recovery prescrip- <br /> tion, as such residents will heip boister the other economic-related pieces which wiil nurse the <br /> areas back to health: (1) housing markets, (2) retail markets, and (3)tax bases. Instead, the inner <br /> city eroded for lack of these and other economic-related staples. <br /> No matter how great the need in Decatur's inner city, there are serious impediments and chal- <br /> lenges to the proposition: <br /> 1. Markets are uncertain. Demand for buildings and the services they provide are often cloudy <br /> and tenuous in areas where the prevalent market pattern is depressed. Skilled negotiators <br /> are needed for establishing investor confidence and for increasing demand for housing and/ <br /> or commerce in a previously distressed area. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.