My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R99-174 AUTHORIZING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1999
>
R99-174 AUTHORIZING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2016 9:49:05 AM
Creation date
4/7/2016 9:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R99-174
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
Approved Date
10/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
price. Appropriate fractional scores will be assigned to other proposers. <br /> The City of Decatur reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted <br /> and use any idea in a proposal regardless of whether the proposal is <br /> selected. <br /> C. Evaluation Criteria <br /> Proposals will be evaluated using three sets of criteria. Firms meeting the <br /> mandatory criteria will have their proposals evaluated and scored for both <br /> technical qualifications and price. The following represent the principal <br /> selection criteria which will be considered during the evaluation process. <br /> 1. Mandatory Elements <br /> a. The study firm is independent and demonstrates a <br /> history of unbiased analysis. The firm has no conflict <br /> of interest with regard to any other work performed by the <br /> firm for the City of Decatur or other organization. <br /> b. The study firm's professional personnel are adequately <br /> training by virtue of their direct experience and education. <br /> c. The firm has had sufficient experience in studies of <br /> comparable fire departments to compete the scope of <br /> services. <br /> d. The firm adheres to the instructions in this request for <br /> proposals on preparing and submitting the proposal. <br /> 2. Technical Qualifications: (Ma�cimum Points - 75) <br /> a. Expertise and Experience (Maximum Points - 50) <br /> (1) The firm's past experience and performance on <br /> comparable government engagements. <br /> (2) The quality of the firm's professional personnel <br /> to be assigned to the engagement and the quality <br /> of the firm's management support personnel to be <br /> available for technical consultation. <br /> b. Study Approach(Ma�cimum Points -25) <br /> (1) Adequacy of proposed staffing plan for <br /> 13 I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.