My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R97-17 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT - ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1997
>
R97-17 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT - ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 3:06:16 PM
Creation date
4/19/2016 3:06:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R97-17
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT - ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. - WATER RATE STUDY
Approved Date
1/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� Attachement A <br /> One issue in the development of the summary results is the determination of <br /> a "fair" return on rate base (net plant investment). Typically, the rate of <br /> return that is used under this approach can be set in two ways. First, a <br /> weighted cost of capital approach can be used. This approach considers both <br /> the City's cost of debt and equity to determine an appropriate rate of return. <br /> This is the approach that is typically used by private water utilities when <br /> rates are set before a State public utility commission (PUC). In contrast to <br /> this approach, the rate of return can also be set at such a level that under the <br /> "utility/accrual" basis approach the utility will earn the same level of total <br /> revenues as was proposed under the "cash basis" revenue requirements. <br /> Utilizing this approach to set the "fair" rate of return, customers should be <br /> mostly indifferent to this assumption, given that the resulting level of rates is <br /> equal to that under the "cash basis" approach. This is the approach that will <br /> most likely be used within this study. <br /> 1.4.7 Development of Average Unit Costs <br /> The cost of service study also provides a second piece of cost information that <br /> is important to the development of final rate designs. The cost of service will <br /> provide average unit costs, or cost based water rate designs. For example, <br /> average unit costs will provide a cost based rate design in terms of$/CCF for <br /> volume and capacity costs, and $/Customer/Month for customer related costs. <br /> The average unit costs ultimately provide the cost basis or justification for <br /> certain rate designs or the setting of various administrative charges. In <br /> summary, the development of average unit costs will provide "cost of service" <br />� based rates for all classes of service within the cost of service study. <br /> 1.5 Development of Water Rate Designs <br /> The final step in the process of developing the water rates is to use the results and <br /> findings from the revenue requirement and cost of service study to develop cost- <br /> based retail rates. <br /> 1.5.1 Rate Designs <br /> The first step in developing final rate designs is to consider the rate design <br /> goals and objectives of the City (e.g. conservation, revenue stability, ease of <br /> administration, etc.). From these goals and objectives, certain rate structures <br /> can be considered for further review and analysis. <br /> The City's current water rates will be reviewed and proposed rate design <br /> options will be developed which meet the target revenue needs of the City. <br /> For each class of service, alternative rate design options will be developed. <br /> Final proposed rate designs will embrace the results of the cost of service <br /> Scope of Services 1-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.