Laserfiche WebLink
A�f DEC7� LAI� MANAGEMENT DIVISION <br /> " ' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />� �sa�' — <br /> ,���'NQ`y MEMORANDUM # 96 65 <br /> TO: 7ames Williams, Jr., City Manager '� <br /> Bruce McNabb,Director ofPublic Works <br /> FROM: Keith Alexander,Lake Manager l� ' <br /> DATE: December 10, 1996 - <br /> SUBJECT: Lake Decatur Watershed Management Feasibility Study Consultant <br /> Three recent presentations to Counc� on the Cit�s water supply have demonstrated the need for <br /> the above study. It will determine the most practical methods for efficiently reducing nitrate and <br /> sediment in Lake Decatur, including cost estimates. This cost/benefit analysis w�71 provide . <br /> definitive answers to controlling these contaminants at their source -the Lake Decatu.r watershed. <br /> This informa.tion will assist City sta� Counc� and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency <br /> finalize our nitrate control decisions. <br /> A key component of the study is the conducting of suc public input meetings to be held this winter <br /> m Decatur, Monticello and Champaign. These are essential to create the cooperation the City <br /> requires from landowners in the 925 square m�e Lake Decatur watershed. <br /> Requests for proposals were maaled to 45 consulting firms. Nme proposaLs were submitted to <br /> City sta� A City review panel, consisting of Rachel McCain, Keith Harris and Keith Alexander, <br /> evaluated the written proposals, then interviewed the top three finalists. The panel determined <br /> that the team headed by Environmental Planning and Economics, Ina (EPE), in association with <br /> University of Illinois faculty, Illinois State Water Survey, Black&Veatch, Limno-Tech and Monti <br /> Communications has the best overall submittal and qualifications for this unique project. This was <br /> based on the EPE team's expertise in watershed modeling, benefit/cost analysis and agricultural <br /> economics. <br /> The proposed EPE contract cost is not to exceed $178,686 and will be com�leted by May of <br /> 1997. Fund.ing for this study was not included 'm the ciurent fiscal year budget due to the timing <br /> of the completion of the Harza Water Resource, Storage and Production Study. However, the <br /> Cit�s Water Fund has the necessary reserves to finance this work. <br /> For cost comparison, the second best rated study proposal, from a team lead by Planning and <br /> Management Consultants, suggested a preliminary, cost estimate of $143,976. Although this <br /> proposal was rated highly, it was determined that the EPE proposal was better suited to meet the <br /> City's needs due to EPE's previously mentioned areas of expertise. <br /> 1 <br />