Laserfiche WebLink
� c = <br /> Mr. Bruce McNabb <br /> December 9, 1996 <br /> Page 4 <br /> the level of technical detail considered in the evaluation will be limited to that judged necessary for <br /> an effective planning level analysis of the alternatives. <br /> Task 3 -Evaluation of Alternative Scenario Costs. The capital and operating and maintenance costs <br /> associated with each of the alternative scenarios defined as a result of Task 2 will be evaluated in <br /> order to assess their economic feasibility. The cost analysis will be based on a conceptual analysis <br /> of life cycle costs for water supply, water quality management, water production and water <br /> distribution improvements required to meet City water needs through the year 2015 (raw water <br /> requirement of approximately 50.9 mgd). This corresponds roughly to the maximum combined <br /> supply that could be provided to Decatur by a combined Lake Decatur/Lake Shelbyville <br /> interconnection system. The goal of the cost analysis will be to define conceptual estimates of total <br /> and incremental (per mgd of additional yield) present worth costs for comparison with the <br /> alternatives presented in the Water Resources/Storage/Production Study. <br /> As part of the cost evaluation,the costs and benefits associated with various operating strategies (90 <br /> day,200 day,continuous)will also be examined. Results of the analysis will be presented in tabular ' <br /> format so as to be easily understood. Results of the cost analysis will also be examined to identify '�, <br /> project components to which the life cycle cost computations are particularly sensitive. <br /> The cost analysis will build upon the analyses performed in conjunction with the Water Resources/ <br /> Storage/Production Study. However,unexplained references to the previous study will be avoided <br /> so that the Lake Shelbyville analysis can be readily understood as a stand-alone document. <br /> Task 4-Preparation of Ana1, siY s Report. The Harza team will present the results of its study to the <br /> City in the form of a brief technical report supplemented with appendices including documentation <br /> of additional data collection efforts (Task 1) and the cost analyses performed (Task 3). Five draft <br /> copies of the report will be provided to the City for review. Following review and discussion of <br /> staff's comments on the draft report, ten copies of a final report will be prepared and submitted. <br /> Per the City's request,the report will be prepared without special or color graphics to facilitate future <br /> prepazation of additional copies by the City. <br /> Proposed Schedule <br /> We recognize that the City wants to finalize its evaluation of these issues as soon as possible given <br /> the aggressive schedule of water system improvement presently in place. As such, we are prepared <br /> to move forward with our analysis immediately following your authorization to proceed. We <br /> anticipate that a draft report summarizing the results of our analysis can be provided to the City <br /> within eight(8)weeks following authorization to proceed. The final report will be provided to the <br /> City within two (2) weeks following our receipt of comments on the draft. <br /> HES BMN_i ll I.WPD JPV/y-2 <br /> 5796G/96I ll 1/961209 <br />