My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
93-26 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SHOREWOOD ESTATES THIRD ADDITION
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
1993
>
93-26 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SHOREWOOD ESTATES THIRD ADDITION
>
93-26 AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SHOREWOOD ESTATES THIRD ADDITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2016 2:28:47 PM
Creation date
8/16/2016 2:28:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
93-26
Res Ord Title
AMENDING RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - SHOREWOOD ESTATES THIRD ADDITION
Approved Date
5/17/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. <br /> � � <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM <br /> NO. 93-71 <br /> � <br /> May 10, 1993 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Erik C. Brechnitz and <br /> City Council Members <br /> FROM: James C. Bacon, Jr. , City Manager . <br /> George C. Weaver, Community Development Acting Directo <br /> SUBJECT: Shorewood Estates Residence Development Plan Amendment, <br /> Lots 8, 9 and 10 <br /> On March 4, 1993 the Decatur City Plan Commission heard the <br /> petition of Paul D. Hopkins to amend a special use permit for <br /> Lots 8, 9, and 10 in Shorewood Estates, Third Addition. The <br /> existing plan calls for three single family lots. Previous plans <br /> have been approved for duplex and multi-family construction. <br /> The Plan Commission heard the request by the petitioner to allow <br /> for the construction of six duplex units. The Plan Commission <br /> recommended approval of the plan as presented. Following the <br /> action of the commission, the petitioner requested that the <br /> actual number of units be reduced from twelve to eight. Because <br /> the petitioner sought a reduction in the number of units, no <br /> action was required by the Plan Commission. <br /> The petitioner seeks one of two actions by the City Council in <br /> the interest of moving this project along. The first <br /> alternative is for four duplex lots along Millstream. The <br /> petitioner respectfully requests the Council to consider an <br /> alternative in the event the Council does not support the <br /> recommendation of the Plan Commission. The petitioner asks that <br /> the Council approve the four single family lots along Millstream. <br /> Staff recommended approval of the proposal as presented to the <br /> Plan Commission and, therefore, has no reservations in <br /> recommending the approval of the four duplex lots. <br /> Council members should be aware that an objection to the petition <br /> has been received containinq the signatures of more than 20 <br /> percent of adjacent and/or contiguous property owners. This will <br /> require a vote of five council members to approve the petition of <br /> Mr. Hopkins. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.