Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3� ' <br /> BUILDING IMPROVEMENT <br /> There are not building improvements on subject land. <br /> HIGHEST AND BEST USE <br /> Highest and best use is defined as "that reasonable and proper <br /> use that supports the highest present value, as defined, as <br /> of the effective date of the appraisal." <br /> Subject land currently has access only over and through other lands <br /> of Southtowne Shopping Center located to the North and Northeast of <br /> subject. There is no access onto U.S. Route 51 on the west of sub- <br /> ject and it is very questionable if this would be permitted. The <br /> City of Decatur owns the land to the south and it is possible that <br /> access could be made available from this direction. The existance <br /> of the underground drainage way and the eYisting water main, sewer, <br /> and electrical easement previously mentioned would appear to re- <br /> strict if not preclude construction of a building on subject. <br /> Subject is currently used for parking for several clients of the <br /> Southtowne Shopping Center and this would appear to be and continue <br /> to be the highest and best use. This would appear to be not only <br /> in the best interest of the owners and tenants of the shopping cen- <br /> ter but for the City of Decatur from sales tax revenue generated. <br /> VALUATION <br /> There are three normal approaches to value. They are: <br /> 1. COST APPROACH in which the cost of reproducing the improvements <br /> are estimated from which is deducted all forms of accrued de- <br /> preciation and then land value is added for the final estimate <br /> of value. <br /> 2. DIRECT SALES COMPARISON APPROACH or often called Market Approach <br /> in which properties which have sold in the market are compared <br /> with subject and appropriate adjustments made. <br /> 3. INCOME APPROACH in wnich the net income of the property is <br /> capitalized at a realistic rate into value. <br /> Since subject is not improved with a building or buildings the cost <br /> approach is not appropriate. The property is leased so the income <br /> approach is applicable and will be used. The direct sales compari- <br /> son approach is not felt to be appropriate as sales of similar pro- <br /> perties were not available when you reflect on the physical char- <br /> acteristics or (water way and access situation) and easements cur- <br /> rently affect subject property. <br />