Laserfiche WebLink
. ' <br /> page 7 - Plan Commission 8/2/?9 <br /> is one home immediately ad acent to the West and one <br /> to the East separated by 1 0 to 200 feet . If you <br /> exa.mine the situation of tl�ose two home owners you have <br /> to ask would it be that ha mful to have an office next <br /> door, bearing in mind the and has been vacant for <br /> quite a few years. An off ce wouTd be operating only <br /> in daylight hours. There re many areas where offices <br /> and homes exist side by si e. Another factor is that <br /> the zoning of this propert to 0-1 could well enhance the <br /> property. Hence he didn' t think it could be argued <br /> it would cause a loss in v lue. So for the reasons <br /> stated, they ask that this petition be recommended to <br /> Council for approval . <br /> There were no objectors pr sent . <br /> Staff recommendations: Mr Menzies said that the petitioner ' s <br /> property fronts on Pershin Road one lot west of a developed <br /> O-1 zone (Blank & Wesselin Professional Engineers <br /> Office Building) . To the orth is M-1 zoned vacant land. <br /> Because of the private cov�nants of the Virginia Addition <br /> prohibiting office develop ent , the petitioner contacted <br /> a 2/3 majority of the prop rty owners who signed the <br /> petition, relieving the pe itioner of the rest�'ictions as <br /> they apply to this site. <br /> The City ' s Comprehensive P an indicates Office Use for the land <br /> fronting on Pershing Road. Therefore the petition is in <br /> conformity with the Compre ensive Plan. Staff recommends <br /> approval of the petition a submitted. <br />, It was moved and seconded Batterham/Martin) that Cal . 79-91 <br /> be recommended to Council or approval. A vote was taken <br /> with all voting aye except Mrs. Wilmeth, who abstained. <br />