Laserfiche WebLink
�Y <br /> Dace 4 - Decatur Ci�y Plzn Com.�ission - 6/1/78 <br /> Cal . �:o. 78-91 Prel i�inarv Plat - �eadowlark F1r5t Addition <br /> *:r . i�ienzies stated t'.:zt t!:is petition �as been withdrawn . <br /> Cal. No . 78-92 Prelir.tinary Plat - Pheasant Run <br /> J.i*a tfasev, t�he petitioner, oras preseat. He statzd t.he <br /> onlv thing he wanted to acd was t:�at he wes going to czange <br /> the note that iadicated nulti-family for lots ? through <br /> 23 to incicate duplex lots . These lots abLt �I-1 zoning <br /> on the sout?�. <br /> Tne onlv other thing was that this is zoned O-1 . Ke:nper <br /> Ins�.ranc� Conpanv bougnt it many veers aco . Now thev are <br /> asking to ch.ange it. Se said 'ne had tal}ced to staf� and <br /> NL. Duner, �ze owner of the N4-1 zon2d prope:tv, and indicated <br /> to bot3: our desire that when this ground is platted for <br /> indus�Tial lots , that they :�ve t':� setback continuec, <br /> which is reQuired in the acjoinir.g Eubhar� Sr.dusi�.rial <br /> Subdivision located south of �iound�ord Scuara . We zre going <br /> under th� assL*nntion that the Plan Comnission will work with <br /> us so L,..�at we do not have a situation where we zre building <br /> up acainst industrial �uild�ncs with little setbacx. <br /> ��L . 2der.zies exalained tzzt i�.r. Masey is also here on I <br /> Cal . �10. 78-77 , w_�ich is t�'�e actual rezoning from Ol to i <br /> R3 PJP. j <br /> Plat Comr.litte� �te�ort: <br /> '_�'ir . Gros s:aan stated that Plat Committee reco�:unenas ZD.JrOV�l , <br /> subjec� to a��roval b� the Ensineeriag and Legal de�artm�nts . <br /> Staff recommendations : ?�ir . ti�enzies stated that for <br /> Cal . No. 78-77 , it is now O-1 south of Ke�pe= Insurance ' <br /> Ce�pany ' s office. I� is located directly east of R-3 <br /> single fa.*nily developraent. He is askina for do��rn zoni�g <br /> to an �DP R-3 . From the beginninc , in discussion wit� <br /> !�ir . r�sey, it was our understanding that these lots that bacic <br /> onto M-1 4�ould be duplex. Staf� f eels that this R-3 RDP <br /> is in harmony with existing single fa.*.:ily to the west aad <br /> in general conformitv with the Comprehensive Plan. we also <br /> recomme�d aa�roval or t�e prelir.iinary ��at (Ca? . No . 78-92 ) <br /> s�ject to t�:e note change that Mr . �lasey pointed out a:�d <br /> subject Lo app_oval �v Lze En�ineering Di�Tision . <br /> T:�ere were no objectors �resent. <br />