Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> �� � • <br /> �ag� 5 - Decatur City Plan Commission - 6/1/78 <br /> T_t was noved and sec�nded (GrossMan/Foster) an�l un�nimousl�,r <br /> �assed that Cal . �10. 78-92 be recommended to Council for <br /> apnroval , subject to appzo��al by 'che Enc�ineering and <br /> L�nal departm�nts . <br /> There .�ere no objectors present for Cal. �io. 73-77 . <br /> I� �ras moved and seconded (F:ing/Grossman) and unanimously <br /> Dassed tnat Cal. .•Io . 73-77 be reco�mended to Council <br /> for apAroval . <br /> Cal . :do. 78-94 Preliminary Plat - �esurvey of Lots 14 <br /> and 15 of rlcCaleb Suadi��ision <br /> The petitioner was present, but had nothinq to add. <br /> Plat Committee: <br /> ��r. Grossman reported that tne plat cor.unittee recommended <br /> approval subject to approval by t�e Engineerinc� and <br /> Leg�l departnents. <br /> Staff recommendations : ��s. Menzies stated that thi� <br /> small thr�e-lot sui�division is outside of tne city and <br /> :neets the Cou,Zty zoning requirements. The staff sees <br /> no problems with tnis small subdivision and recomriends <br /> approval subject to engineerin� and legal approval. <br /> Tr.ere were no objectors present. <br /> Tt was moved and seconded (�r7ilmeth/Foster) and unanimously <br /> passed that Cal. i�'o. 78-94 be recomr.iended to Council fo.r <br /> approval subject to approval �y t�:e Enaineerinn and <br /> Legal depart:nents. <br /> Cal. No. 78-95 Final Plat - pesurvey of Lots 14 and <br /> 15 of McCaleb Subdivision. <br /> Plat Committee Report: <br /> Mr. Grossman stated that since th� final pl�t is in conformit_y <br /> to th� preliminary plat, the Plat Committee recor:�mends <br /> ap�roval, su�ject to approval bv the Engineering an�? Legal <br /> de�artments . + <br /> It was moved an�. seconded, (:�:cCann/Col�) and unanimously <br /> nassed that Cal. �30. 78-95 be recommended to Council for <br /> approval , subject to Enaineering and Leqal department <br /> approval . <br />