My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2018-129 Resolution to Approve a Professional Engineering Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Brush College / Faries Parkway Grade Separation, City Project 2009-33
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2018
>
R2018-129 Resolution to Approve a Professional Engineering Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Brush College / Faries Parkway Grade Separation, City Project 2009-33
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2020 11:12:42 AM
Creation date
10/2/2018 9:50:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2018-129
Res Ord Title
R2018-129 Resolution to Approve a Professional Engineering Services Agreement with AECOM Technical Services, Inc. for Brush College / Faries Parkway Grade Separation, City Project 2009-33
Department
Public Works
Approved Date
10/1/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A <br /> Task 00100 Survev and Field Work(overview) <br /> Survey work will include topographic surveys both Lidar and Conventional. Work will involve surveys on <br /> railroad property and will require railroad coordination,access permits and flagger operations and railroad <br /> insurance. Survey field work will also require environmental surveys including ground sampling and boring <br /> operations in support of environmental reports and memos. Survey work will be required for ROW surveys <br /> in support of plats and legal preparation. Field work will be required for geotechnical borings in support of <br /> geotechnical reports. Access to properties will be required and access wilI be coordinated through the City <br /> and or the City property negotiator. An access letter from the City explaining the project and the need for <br /> surveys will be drafted and used for field work. <br /> Task 00200 Phase I Undate—VE CR ABC(overview) <br /> The Phase I design will require modifications as the project was broken up into three segments and the north <br /> segment will need to tie into the existing roadway geometty near the existing railroad subway. Though <br /> initial Value Engineering and Constructability Reviews further cost savings and design changes may be <br /> identified with the overall goal of designing the project to meet the funding limits and minimize impacts to <br /> the motoring public. These modifications will be submitted to the City and IDOT for approval. Accelerated <br /> Bridge Construction techniques will be investigated under this task. <br /> It is assumed that the traffic volumes in the Phase I report will not be modified and will be used for rework of <br /> the geometry of the revised Phase I design including Plan and Profiles, IDS and TSL's. <br /> Roadwav GeometrX <br /> The roadway geometry will be updated to include horizontal geometry tie in between the existing and <br /> proposed improvements of Brush College Road near the existing Norfolk Southern Railyard overpass. This <br /> will include profile modifications to tie into the existing underpass profile grade. <br /> Optimize Current Bridge Design <br /> The objective of this task is to take a fresh look at the current phase I bridge design to optimize selected <br /> bridge type to evaluate potential cost saving options. <br /> Revise Type, Size and Location(TSL)Plans <br /> Based on the above optimization to the bridge structure,it may be necessary to revise the cunent TSL plans <br /> to include feasible modifications. <br /> Value En ineerin�(VE)and Constructability Reviews(CR): <br /> Prior to milestone submittals(Preliminary and Final),construction documents will be reviewed by senior <br /> engineers from AECOM,WHKS and QEI(to be led by AECOM)with extensive experience in design and <br /> construction of similar bridges. The intent of this review is to make suggestions to improve the design and <br /> details relative to generally utilized construction practices. <br /> Scope 9-21-18 A_2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.