Laserfiche WebLink
e„ N , <br /> 1> Guidepost <br /> What We Heard <br /> During each meeting,the City heard about important transportation safety concerns and ideas for improvements. The <br /> key takeaways that were identified throughout discussions with the TAC were community buy-in,driver behavior,and <br /> implementation. <br /> TAC members were given an engagement graphic for the plan's e\ ' <br /> online website and asked to share the website through email within 1 <br /> AlONNECT ON <br /> their organization, on social media platforms, or by informing kr SOCIAL <br /> SOCIAL PINPOINT <br /> ine cty o�Decmw s�.vornng to make ow SCAN THE QR CODE <br /> community members at events. Each TAC member committed to the roodswlw°nr rw,.°ccesslbWl«R. Fx,T,1,?,7 ouR <br /> -aiv°rs.cyclmis,onap slrwns alae. SMARTPTIONE <br /> following leadership responsibilities: wR.°n1Y«R1°rte en�l�-,�nr« <br /> injures an0 improve mediiry. <br /> Wonnect+im us or sociooi I L9: , <br /> 9npont°Y using r,y. <br /> • Offering knowledge, ideas,and testimonials with the `"""`”""°°`°"""" °°` M t-4 <br /> 04, <br /> project team I.DROP VIN 0j7I,,V t5^' <br /> 2.SELECT A CATEGORY �� J <br /> 3.ADD YOUR COMMENTS <br /> • Facilitating and encouraging other community members to 4 CLICK SUBMIT °,s;t <br /> bitIy/DocaturSRcioIPinpoint <br /> get involved <br /> GET INVOLVED AND HAVEtomteroctwith our <br /> YOUR VOICE HEARD! <br /> engagement site Intl.,' <br /> I <br /> • Ensuring that the plan is implemented to its fullest extent 0 <br /> p Monitoring the plans for continued use and success in the , <br /> future <br /> Meeting summaries for each of the TAC meetings can be found at the end of the plan in Appendix C. <br /> Online Engagement and Interactive Map <br /> The engagement team used various communication methods to inform the public about the project and promote the <br /> interactive map. These methods included flyers,social media engagement graphics,emails, and TAC members. <br /> The engagement team developed an interactive website on Social Pinpoint that allowed community members to get <br /> a high-level overview of the project, and a scheduled timeline. The website included an interactive map that allowed <br /> community members to leave location-specific comments. This map allowed the public to highlight areas where they <br /> experienced real-life safety concerns or areas across the City that they felt needed improvement. <br /> The interactive map received 257 contributions <br /> 0.8% (2) from community members. Based on previous <br /> 5.2% (39) 46.7% (120) studies that have used Social Pinpoint, this <br /> number of contributors exceeds what the project <br /> team has experienced before. Furthermore, <br /> ■ Safe Crossing contributions are not all concentrated on one <br /> L Unsafe Crossing street or neighborhood, rather they are dispersed <br /> General Comment throughout the city. <br /> ■ Opportunities <br /> 37.4% (96) <br /> kaput Page 9 of 81 <br /> 11 all in <br />