Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br /> Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> COMMON NAME: 180 West Imboden Drive and 2110-2181 Imboden Place <br /> GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> Hearing Date October 6, 2011 <br /> Calendar No. 11-36 <br /> Property Location 180 West Imboden Drive and 2110-2181 Imboden Place <br /> Requested Action Rezone from R-5 Special Use Permit and R-5 Residential Development <br /> Plan(RDP)to PD Planned Development <br /> Petitioner John and Martha Brinkoetter <br /> Representative Phillip W. Cochran <br /> LAND USE AND ZONING <br /> Direction Existing Land Use Zoning Comprehensive Plan <br /> Subject Property Undeveloped/Nursing R-5 Special Residential Low-Density <br /> Home/Two-Family Residence Use Permit, <br /> R-5 RDP <br /> North Single Family Residence R-3 Residential Low-Density <br /> South Single Family Residence, R-5, R-3 Residential Low-Density <br /> Assisted Living Facility <br /> East Single Family Residence R-3 Residential Low-Density <br /> West Single Family Residence, R-3 Schools <br /> School <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> 1. On March 4, 1982 the City Plan Commission voted 8-1-1 to approve the rezoning from R-3 <br /> Single Family Residence District to R-5 Residential Development Plan (R-5 RDP). The petition <br /> was approved by City Council by a 5-2 vote on March 22, 1982. <br /> 2. The petitioner proposed to rezone a total of 10.25 acres to R-5 RDP to allow for the construction <br /> of a 120 unit apartment complex in three phases of development. Phase One would consist of a <br /> commercial building and 51 units, Phase Two would contain 48 units, and Phase Three would <br /> contain 21 units. It was the intention of the petitioner to develop these units as condominiums <br /> and restrict the occupancy to persons age 62 and over. <br /> 3. On January 5, 1989 the petitioner requested that Ordinance # 82-36 that granted the R-5 RDP be <br /> repealed. The petitioner then requested an R-5 Special Use Permit to allow for the construction <br /> and operation of a 91 bed residential care facility (nursing home) on the west side of said tract. <br /> The remaining east side of the tract (approximately six acres) would remain vacant; any further <br /> development would require additional zoning and/or subdivision action. City Council approved <br /> these request on February 6, 1989 with a 6-0 vote. <br /> 4. In October of 1989 the petitioner went before Plan Commission requesting that the east side of <br /> the tract be developed and rezoned to an R-5 RDP. The request was for a congregate living <br />