Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. John stated his concern was more in the future if another business would take up <br /> residence in this building how the traffic would be coming in and out of Ravina Park <br /> Road. Mr. Crowe stated it is always possible but felt that due to the restrictive size and <br /> layout of the property, B-2 uses would be limited. <br /> Mr. Clevenger entered the meeting at 3:20 P.M. <br /> Mrs. Sadorus was also concerned about the entrance being on Ravina Park Road and how <br /> it might be a problem in the future. Mrs. Sadorus was concerned about cars possibly be <br /> stored outside the building. <br /> Mr. Mark Plotner, representative for the petitioner, was sworn in by Ms. Jesse. <br /> Mr. Plotner stated Mr. Tallman and himself looked at several locations to store Mr. <br /> Tallman's antique car collection; cazs are currently being stored in the basement of the <br /> former Tallman Pontiac Dealership. Mr. Plotner stated none of these cars would be <br /> stored outside. This location seemed to be the best and most convenient since Mr. <br /> Plotner lived nearby and could keep an eye on the activity around the building. Mr. <br /> Plotner stated a nice building would be built with temperature controls. <br /> Mr. John questioned the dimensions on the drawing the City Plan Commission was <br /> given. Mr. Plotner explained how and where points were and said the drawing was not to <br /> scale. <br /> Mr. Jack Tallman,petitioner, was sworn in by Ms. Jesse. <br /> Mr. Tallman stated there would be weeks when no one would be in the building and felt <br /> like the tr�c issue would not be a problem. Mr. Tallman stated there was a church <br /> neazby as well as a gas station and this didn't seem to cause a problem with the traffic <br /> flow in the area. <br /> There were no obj ectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded(Nordholm/Anderson) to forwazd Cal.No. OS-36 to the City <br /> Council with the recommendation for approval as submitted by petitioner. Motion <br /> carried with nine (9) voting yes and Mr. John voting no. <br />