My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2005-158 PLACING ON FILE FINAL REPORT
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2005
>
R2005-158 PLACING ON FILE FINAL REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 3:44:00 PM
Creation date
12/7/2015 3:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2005-158
Res Ord Title
PLACING ON FILE FINAL REPORT - FIVE YEAR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PLAN FOR CHRONICALLY HOMELESS
Approved Date
11/7/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FIVE YEAR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PLAN <br /> FINAL REPORT <br /> federal, state, and local levels. These inciude HUD's Supportive Housing <br /> Program, the Federal Home Loan Bank, IHDA's Affordabie Housing Trust Fund <br /> and HOME Programs, DCEO's Energy Assistance Program and the City of <br /> Decatur HOME funds. <br /> Although these approaches focus on the use of existing housing, new construction will <br /> be used on a limited basis to create additional permanent supportive housing units. Due <br /> to the high costs of new construction and lack of demand for smaller units in the general <br /> rental market, it is not economically feasible to create a large inventory of new studio <br /> and one bedroom apartments, which may become obsolete over time. An alternate <br /> approach option is to expand the unit mix within other newly constructed and affordable <br /> and supportive housing developments for families to include a percentage of smaller <br /> units, up to 20%, for the chronically homeless. <br /> Site Selection Criteria <br /> To begin the process of identifying and assessing potential sites, the Planning Team <br /> develo ed site evaluation criteria for land and /or ro e ac uisition. A matrix was <br /> P p p q <br /> rtY <br /> created which enabled participants to establish standards and guidelines for the <br /> selection of the most suitable and appropriate sites for each of the proposed housing <br /> models. Specific site evaluation criteria established is summarized below <br /> • Location and Neighborhood. Potential sites should be in close proximity to <br /> supportive services (within one half mile), accessible to public transportation, and <br /> free from negative influences. Safe Haven developments should not be located near <br /> schools. <br /> • Zoning and Regulatory Environment. Current zoning designations for both <br /> existing properties and buildable land should be R-6 for SRO and SLA <br /> developments and any R classification for Safe Havens. The latter single famity <br /> PAGE 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.