My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
R2001-17 AUTHORIZING SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2001
>
R2001-17 AUTHORIZING SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2016 4:24:35 PM
Creation date
1/22/2016 4:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
R2001-17
Res Ord Title
AUTHORIZING SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2001 / 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Approved Date
2/5/2001
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. , <br /> Neighborhood Services Department Memorandum <br /> 01-06 <br /> DATE: January 31, 2001 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor Howley and City Council <br /> FROM: Steve Garman, City Manager ' 1 <br /> Reginald Fluker, Director—Neighborhood Services Dept. � <br /> Valencia Thompson, Renewal Section Administrator '�� <br /> Patricia Tyus, Program Specialist/Evaluation Committee Chair,� <br /> SUBJECT: CDBG Public Services/Facilities Allocations—FY01/02 <br /> SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests approval of its FY 2001-02 <br /> recommendations for allocating to community organizations, the related year's U.S. Department <br /> of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) <br /> funding for public services and public facilities. <br /> BACKGROUND: Each year the City requests applications from not-for-profit organizations <br /> that need additional funding in support of community programs that meet Federal, State, and <br /> Local regulations and guidelines. Each application must include specific information, <br /> documentation, and a funding request that enables Staff to evaluate the proposal for regulatory <br /> compliance, capacity, service level, adequacy, and capability. <br /> A public hearing is conducted to explain and clarify information contained in the request for <br /> applications (RFA). After receipt of applications by the published cut-off date, an application <br /> evaluation committee is established. Additionally, Staff conducts site visits with each of the <br /> applicants. Each application is thoroughly reviewed, evaluated, and scored based on pre- <br /> determined and published criteria. A recommended funding amount is then calculated for each <br /> application based on its Consolidated Plan priority level, its score, and the requested amount. <br /> Each applicant is then notified of the proposed CDBG funding recommendation in an effort to <br /> determine if the recommendation, along with other non-CDBG funding, is sufficient to operate <br /> the program. This year, Staff inet with all of the applicants to explain, discuss, and receive <br /> comments on the evaluation and funding determination process. For those applicants that could <br /> not be recommended for funding, Staff conducted individual and private meetings to explain <br /> why, and to provide helpful information on how the respective program could be potentially <br /> positioned to receive funding in a later fiscal year. <br /> Although not required, all applicants were invited to attend the Council meeting on February 5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.