Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> Excerpts from Plan Commission Minutes of September 4, 2003. <br /> Cal. No. 03-44 Petition of REAL ESTATE INVESTORS OF DECATUR, <br /> LLC, to amend the B-2 Planned Unit Development of Holiday <br /> Harbor, located at 4100 West U. S. Route 36. <br /> Mr. Dane Bragg presented the recommendation of staff: <br /> The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the approved B-2 Planned Unit <br /> Development in order to change the lighting plan for the street right-of-way along <br /> Holiday Harbor Parkway and Fountain Lane. <br /> The PUD was approved in April, 2002 and shows decorative street lighting along the <br /> center medians of the streets. Because of circuitry requirements of the local electric <br /> utility, the petitioner has found it cost prohibitive to provide the lighting in the original <br /> layout. <br /> The petitioner has proposed utilizing the decorative, or accent, lighting on the outer <br /> edges of the right-of-way. These lights would be metered to the lot owners and not to <br /> the City of Decatur. The center medians will utilize an Illinois Power fixture that will <br /> provide a considerably more uniform street light level. <br /> The proposed amendment will benefit the developer and the City of Decatur by <br /> relieving the City of Decatur of maintenance responsibilities for the accent lighting. In <br /> addition, the proposed layout will simplify the required circuits for the project, thereby <br /> reducing costs to the developer. The proposed median lighting will be maintained by <br /> Illinois Power Company. The changes to the lighting plan are believed to be generally <br /> consistent with the previously approved plan by providing a high quality lighting plan <br /> for the subdivision. Staff recommends approval of the petition as proposed, provided <br /> that development is also in accordance with the executed development agreement. <br /> Mr. Cochran told the Commission that the initial plan that was approved for the ornamental <br /> lighting fixtures was not going to be feasible. He stated that, under the City's franchise <br /> agreement with Illinois Power Company, the City would own the fixtures and be responsible <br /> for maintenance and utility locations. The utility company came up with a plan for new fixtures <br /> that would make it so that individual lot owners would be responsible for maintenance and not <br /> the City. <br /> There were no objectors present. <br /> It was moved and seconded (John/Naber) to forward Cal. No. 03-44 to City Council with <br /> recommendation for approval as submitted by petitioner. Motion carried unanimously. <br />