My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-104 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION XX - SPECIAL DISTRICTS
COD
>
City Clerk
>
ORDINANCES
>
2002
>
2002-104 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION XX - SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2016 11:59:47 AM
Creation date
2/29/2016 11:59:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolution/Ordinance
Res Ord Num
2002-104
Res Ord Title
AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION XX - SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Approved Date
11/18/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM <br /> No. 02-116 <br /> November 13, 2002 <br /> TO: Mayor Terry M. Howley and City Council Members <br /> FROM: Steve G , City Manager <br /> A. J. Krie , Economic and Urban Development Department <br /> Steven J. Van Steenhuyse, Planning Mana��� <br /> �9' � <br /> SUBJECT: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance: Special Districts (Institutional Overlay <br /> District) <br /> SLTMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached Section XX to <br /> the Zoning Ordinance, establishing the I-OL Institutional Overlay District. <br /> BACKGROUND: At the time the new Zoning Ordinance was drafted, there was discussion of <br /> creating overlay districts to address specific issues in particular neighborhoods. An overlay <br /> district provides regulations in addition to the existing underlying zoning. Section XX was <br /> purposely reserved and left blank for this purpose. In response to the recent growth of the City's <br /> major institutions such as Millikin University, St. Mary's Hospital and Decatur Memorial <br /> Hospital, it was determined that an overlay district for institutions was needed. <br /> The proposed language allows an institution to propose overlay district boundaries that anticipate <br /> future growth. The institution must provide justification of these boundaries in the form of a <br /> master plan, site plan, land use projections, or similar justification. The overlay district has <br /> specific provisions for setbacks, height, signage, etc. for institutional growth. The district <br /> provides protections to the surrounding neighborhoods by requiring a Planned Development <br /> review process for all expansions unless the following conditions are met: the expansion site <br /> must be at least one acre in area, it must be contiguous to the existing institutional campus, and it <br /> cannot surround a one or two family property on more than two sides. Finally, variances within <br /> the overlay district must be reviewed by the Plan Commission and approved by the City Council <br /> rather than going to the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br /> This action only provides the legislative framework for creation of an Institutional Overlay <br /> District and does not actually create any such districts or propose future boundaries. If this <br /> amendment is passed, in order for an institution to take advantage of the Institutional Overlay <br /> District it must follow the same process as rezoning(petition to create the overlay district, <br /> followed by a public hearing before the Plan Commission and final approval by the City <br /> Council). <br /> The intent of the Institutional Overlay District is to strike a balance between the expansion of the <br /> City's growing institutions and the protection of the surrounding residential neighborhoods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.