Laserfiche WebLink
Decatur City Plan Commission <br /> Apri14, 2002 <br /> Page Thirteen <br /> ii <br /> Resident Manager. A fourth building would have a community room, recreational, social, mail <br /> and laundry facilities as well as an office for the manager. This is not a treatment center. The <br /> development would allow for the residents to be checked on without being intrusive. The group <br /> home would have a 24 hour staff. <br /> Mr. Wilkinson stated that there would be a line of shrubs on Charles Street. The project faces <br /> inward. He stated that the development would be good for the clients and adds to the <br /> community. There would be a sewer line on the north border and then taken south. The entrance <br /> to the property will have a grade change to allow water to flow faster. There would not be much <br /> additional traffic and the clients usually do not have vehicles. There would be vans to transfer <br /> the residents to treatment. The design is to move people in groups and reinforces a sense of <br /> community. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the project is time sensitive as they must have control <br /> over the property per HUD so that Phases II and III happen in May. <br /> Mrs. Sands asked if the development would look like the picture that the Commission had. Mr. <br /> Wilkinson stated that the picture was computer generated and the trees are exaggerated. The <br /> units on Wagoner and Warren are very similar to those pictured and will be vinyl sided with bay <br /> windows. The development will not look institutional. <br /> There were objectors present: <br /> Ms. Ellen Massey, 3592 North Charles, was present and spoke against the petition stating that <br /> she lives across the street from the subject property. Ms. Massey stated that this is a residential <br /> area and not the proper place for the proposed development. She thanked Mrs. Sands for her <br /> comment regarding the road. Ms. Massey stated that there are no sidewalks, 16 school buses <br /> make daily trips on Charles Street and it is impossible to back out of the driveways at times. She <br /> stated that there would be more traffic if the vans were bringing the residents back and forth. <br /> She stated she has lived in her home for 38 years and the house is 40 years old. Ms. Massey <br /> stated that she was told it would cost at least $7,000 to connect to the sewer and she stated that <br /> she would never get that money back if the property were sold. <br /> Ms. Massey presented a petition of objection signed by the area residents. <br /> Ms. Sue Lake, 3570 North Charles was present and spoke against the petition stating that several <br /> of the neighbors were present and appreciated the opportunity to address the Commission. Ms. <br /> Lake asked if the Commission members would want this development across the street from <br /> their homes and around their children. She stated that the clients could not be kept out of the <br /> area's businesses and they weren't wanted in people's yards. Ms. Lake stated that she was told <br /> she would never see sewer in that area and there were not enough people to warrant it. Now <br /> HUD decides on this property and there will be sewer. She stated that if they had been working <br />